首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease >Reevaluation of the Premier Clostridium difficile toxin A and B immunoassay with comparison to glutamate dehydrogenase common antigen testing evaluating Bartels cytotoxin and Prodesse ProGastro Cd polymerase chain reaction as confirmatory procedures.
【24h】

Reevaluation of the Premier Clostridium difficile toxin A and B immunoassay with comparison to glutamate dehydrogenase common antigen testing evaluating Bartels cytotoxin and Prodesse ProGastro Cd polymerase chain reaction as confirmatory procedures.

机译:重新评估艰难梭菌毒素A和B的免疫测定结果,并与谷氨酸脱氢酶常见抗原检测结果进行比较,以Bartels细胞毒素和Prodesse ProGastro Cd聚合酶链反应作为验证程序。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Enzyme immunoassays are currently the most common tests used in the clinical laboratory for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins; however, significant problems with their performance have recently been described. We prospectively reevaluated the Meridian Premier C. difficile toxin A/B assay with direct comparison to a 2-step algorithm that screened for C. difficile common antigen and compared cytotoxin and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as confirmatory procedures. The Premier assay lacked sufficient sensitivity, missing 25% of true-positive samples. PCR was the most sensitive method and the only procedure that allowed same day testing and reporting.
机译:酶免疫测定法是目前临床实验室中最常用的检测艰难梭菌毒素的检测方法。然而,最近已经描述了其性能上的重大问题。我们前瞻性地重新评估了Meridian Premier艰难梭菌毒素A / B测定法,并与筛选艰难梭菌常见抗原的两步法直接比较,并比较了细胞毒素和实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)作为确证程序。 Premier检测缺乏足够的灵敏度,漏掉了25%的真实阳性样本。 PCR是最敏感的方法,也是唯一可以当天进行测试和报告的程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号