...
首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease >Evaluation of alternative disk diffusion methods for detecting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in an international collection of staphylococci: validation report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.
【24h】

Evaluation of alternative disk diffusion methods for detecting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in an international collection of staphylococci: validation report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.

机译:评估在国际葡萄球菌集合中检测mecA介导的奥沙西林耐药性的其他纸片扩散方法:SENTRY抗菌素监测计划的验证报告。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To validate the current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommendations of the cefoxitin disk as a preferred surrogate marker to detect oxacillin resistance in staphylococcal isolates, 304 staphylococcal isolates originating from 49 sites in 16 countries in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2003) were tested. Two hundred three Staphylococcus aureus and 101 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), of which >95% were bloodstream isolates, were evaluated by comparing the results of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth microdilution method for oxacillin with those of the disk diffusion test using oxacillin, cefoxitin and ceftizoxime disks. Discrepancies were resolved using the PBP2a latex agglutination test. For S. aureus, the cefoxitin disk performed without interpretive error followed by the ceftizoxime disk (1% major and 0.5% minor errors; > or =20 mm = susceptible); use of the oxacillin disk test had the highest error rates with 4.4% major and1.5% minor errors, whereas the oxacillin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) test was 99.0% accurate. For CoNS, the oxacillin disk test had the highest error rate with 4.0% major errors, followed by the cefoxitin (3.0% major error rate) and the ceftizoxime (1% very major and 1% minor error: > or =20 mm = susceptible) disk tests. The oxacillin MIC test was also 99.0% accurate for CoNS testing. Modification of the ceftizoxime disk diffusion breakpoints for CoNS resulted in complete intermethod categorical agreement. The overall accuracy of the four tests was as follows: modified ceftizoxime disk (99.3%) > oxacillin MIC = cefoxitin disk (99.0%) > current ceftizoxime disk (98.4%) > oxacillin disk (94.7%). In conclusion, these results confirm the superior performance characteristics of cefoxitin and ceftizoxime disk tests as surrogate markers to detect oxacillin resistance; by using an international collection of clinically significant staphylococcal isolates, we also demonstrate its wide global application.
机译:为了验证当前的国家临床实验室标准委员会对头孢西丁磁盘的推荐作为检测葡萄球菌分离株中奥沙西林耐药性的首选替代标记,在SENTRY抗菌监测计划(2003)中测试了来自16个国家49个地点的304葡萄球菌分离株。通过比较美国国家临床实验室标准委员会肉汤微量稀释法对奥沙西林的结果与圆盘扩散试验的结果,对233株金黄色葡萄球菌和101株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)进行了评估,其中> 95%是血流分离株。使用奥沙西林,头孢西丁和头孢唑肟片。使用PBP2a乳胶凝集测试解决了差异。对于金黄色葡萄球菌,头孢西丁片的操作无解释错误,其次是头孢唑肟片(1%的主要错误和0.5%的次要错误;>或= 20 mm =易感);使用奥沙西林纸片测试的错误率最高,主要错误为4.4%,次要错误为1.5%,而奥沙西林最小抑菌浓度(MIC)测试的准确性为99.0%。对于CoNS,奥沙西林盘测试的错误率最高,主要错误率为4.0%,其次是头孢西丁(主要错误率为3.0%)和头孢唑肟(主要错误为1%,次要错误为1%:>或= 20 mm =易感)磁盘测试。对于CoNS测试,奥沙西林MIC测试的准确性也达到99.0%。修改CoNS的头孢唑肟圆盘扩散断点导致了完整的方法分类协议。四个测试的总体准确性如下:改良的头孢唑肟片(99.3%)>奥沙西林MIC =头孢西丁片(99.0%)>当前的头孢唑肟片(98.4%)>唑西林片(94.7%)。总之,这些结果证实了头孢西丁和头孢唑肟圆盘试验作为检测奥沙西林耐药性的替代标志物具有优越的性能特征。通过使用具有临床意义的葡萄球菌分离物的国际收藏,我们还证明了其在全球的广泛应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号