...
首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic cytopathology >Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast masses: An SROC curve with fixed and random effects linear meta-regression models.
【24h】

Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast masses: An SROC curve with fixed and random effects linear meta-regression models.

机译:可触及的乳腺肿块细针穿刺细胞学检查的诊断准确性:具有固定效应和随机效应的线性meta回归模型的SROC曲线。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We used various meta-analytic methods to compare 25 studies describing fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytologic analyses performed from 1984 to 2007 on palpable breast masses. We found that in the 25 studies examined, the sensitivity ranged from 78% to 100%, the specificity ranged from 76% to 100%, and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) ranged from 15.83 to 33 198. The overall diagnostic accuracy was found to be as follows: 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92-0.94) for sensitivity, 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.98) for specificity, and 505.209 (95% CI: 273.08-934.95) for the DOR. The overall diagnostic accuracy according to the results of summary receiving operating characteristic (SROC) curve analysis was 0.95 +/- 0.0032, and the overall weighted area under the (receiving operating characteristic [ROC]) curve (AUC) was 0.99 +/- 0.0014. The DOR values did not show a large variation in the various positivity threshold values. However, the results of those studies had some heterogeneity. The four covariates that were added to the standard SROC model to evaluate variations in the results of the studies were the year of publication, the number of aspirations, the percentage of insufficient material, and the study design. The relative diagnostic accuracy of studies performed after 1990 was 3.98 times higher than that of studies performed before 1990. The relative DOR (RDOR) value was also found to be statistically significant (95% CI: 1.22-13.02). That result may be attributed to the technologic improvements in diagnostic tools over the years. Although it was not statistically significant, an increase in the number of aspirations caused an increase in the RDOR of the FNA cytology (95% CI: 0.52-8.11). In contrast, increasing the percent of insufficient material caused a statistically insignificant but clinically significant decrease in the RDOR of FNA (RDOR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.21-2.98). In conclusion, our meta-analysis has shown that FNA cytologic analysis of palpable breast masses is highly accurate in the diagnostic differentiation of benign from malignant tumors. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2008;36:303-310. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:我们使用了多种荟萃分析方法来比较25项研究,这些研究描述了从1984年至2007年对可触及的乳腺肿块进行的细针穿刺(FNA)细胞学分析。我们发现,在所检查的25项研究中,灵敏度的范围为78%至100%,特异性的范围为76%至100%,诊断比值比(DOR)的范围为15.83至33198。发现了总体诊断准确性如下所示:灵敏度为0.93(95%CI:0.92-0.94),特异性为0.98(95%CI:0.97-0.98),DOR为505.209(95%CI:273.08-934.95)。根据汇总接收运行特征(SROC)曲线分析结果得出的总体诊断准确性为0.95 +/- 0.0032,(接收运行特征[ROC])曲线(AUC)下的总加权面积为0.99 +/- 0.0014 。 DOR值在各种阳性阈值中没有显示出很大的变化。但是,这些研究的结果存在一些异质性。添加到标准SROC模型中以评估研究结果差异的四个协变量是出版年份,期望数量,材料不足百分比和研究设计。 1990年之后进行的研究的相对诊断准确性比1990年之前进行的研究高3.98倍。相对DOR(RDOR)值也具有统计学意义(95%CI:1.22-13.02)。该结果可能归因于多年来诊断工具的技术改进。尽管无统计学意义,但抽吸次数的增加导致FNA细胞学检查的RDOR升高(95%CI:0.52-8.11)。相反,增加不足材料的百分比会导致FNA的RDOR在统计学上不显着但在临床上显着降低(RDOR = 0.79,95%CI:0.21-2.98)。总之,我们的荟萃分析表明,可触及的乳腺肿块的FNA细胞学分析在诊断良性肿瘤与恶性肿瘤方面非常准确。诊断细胞病。 2008; 36:303-310。 (c)2008 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号