首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes research and clinical practice >HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose and the prediction of diabetes: Inter99, AusDiab and D.E.S.I.R.
【24h】

HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose and the prediction of diabetes: Inter99, AusDiab and D.E.S.I.R.

机译:HbA1c,空腹血糖和糖尿病预测:Inter99,AusDiab和D.E.S.I.R.

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction: With diabetes defined by HbA1c ≥ 6.5% and/or FPG ≥ 7.0. mmol/l and/or diabetes treatment, we investigated HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) thresholds/change-points above which the incidence of diabetes increases. Methods: Data are Danish (Inter99), Australian (AusDiab) and French (D.E.S.I.R.), with respectively 4930, 6012 and 3784 non-diabetic participants. Results: Diabetes incidences at 5 years for Inter99 and AusDiab and at 6 years for D.E.S.I.R. were 2.3%, 3.1% and 2.4% respectively and incidences increased with baseline HbA1c and FPG. As HbA1c distributions differed between cohorts, HbA1c was standardized on D.E.S.I.R. data. Change-points where diabetes incidence increased were identified for HbA1c (%) after standardization: 5.1 (4.9-5.6) (Inter99), 5.4 (5.1-5.6) (AusDiab), 5.3 (5.1-5.7) (D.E.S.I.R.); for FPG change-points (mmol/l) were 5.1 (...-6.1) (Inter99), 5.5 (5.2-5.8) (AusDiab), no change-point for D.E.S.I.R. Using current diabetes risk criteria HbA1c ≥ 5.7% and/or FPG ≥ 5.6. mmol/l to screen for diabetes provided high sensitivity (over 89%) and positive predictive values: 4.3%, 6.9%, and 5.9% respectively. Conclusions: HbA1c and FPG change-points predicting incident diabetes did not always exist, differed across studies, when available were generally lower than current criteria with wide confidence intervals. Using jointly HbA1c ≥ 5.7% and/or FPG ≥ 5.6. mmol/l as a criterion for the risk of incident diabetes is appropriate.
机译:简介:HbA1c≥6.5%和/或FPG≥7.0定义为糖尿病。 mmol / l和/或糖尿病治疗,我们研究了HbA1c和空腹血糖(FPG)阈值/变化点,高于这些阈值/改变点,糖尿病的发病率就会增加。方法:数据为丹麦(Inter99),澳大利亚(AusDiab)和法国(D.E.S.I.R.),分别有4930、6012和3784名非糖尿病参与者。结果:Inter99和AusDiab在5年时的糖尿病发生率以及D.E.S.I.R.在6年时的糖尿病发生率。基线HbA1c和FPG分别为2.3%,3.1%和2.4%,且发病率增加。由于队列之间的HbA1c分布不同,因此HbA1c在D.E.S.I.R.数据。标准化后确定HbA1c糖尿病发生率增加的变化点(%):5.1(4.9-5.6)(Inter99),5.4(5.1-5.6)(AusDiab),5.3(5.1-5.7)(D.E.S.I.R.); FPG的变化点(mmol / l)为5.1(...- 6.1)(Inter99),5.5(5.2-5.8)(AusDiab),D.E.S.I.R.没有变化点。使用当前的糖尿病风险标准,HbA1c≥5.7%和/或FPG≥5.6。筛查糖尿病的mmol / l具有较高的敏感性(超过89%)和阳性预测值:分别为4.3%,6.9%和5.9%。结论:HbA1c和FPG改变点并不总是可以预测糖尿病的发生,不同研究之间存在差异,可用时通常低于当前标准,且置信区间较宽。联合使用HbA1c≥5.7%和/或FPG≥5.6。以mmol / l作为发生糖尿病风险的标准是适当的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号