...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes research and clinical practice >The association between Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale scores and glycemic control is modified by types of diabetes therapy: Diabetes Distress and Care Registry in Tenri (DDCRT 2)
【24h】

The association between Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale scores and glycemic control is modified by types of diabetes therapy: Diabetes Distress and Care Registry in Tenri (DDCRT 2)

机译:糖尿病量表评分中的问题区域与血糖控制之间的关联因糖尿病治疗的类型而改变:Tenri中的糖尿病困扰和护理登记处(DDCRT 2)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aim: To evaluate the joint association of Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale scores and glycemic control with diabetes therapy. Methods: We used 3479 patients' data with type 1 and type 2. Modified Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) for poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7.0%) across quartiles of PAID scores. Results: Compared with the 1st quartile of PAID score, multivariable-adjusted RRs for poor glycemic control were 0.99 (95%CI, 0.87-1.11), 1.05 (95%CI, 0.93-1.18), and 1.12 (95%CI, 1.00-1.27), respectively, for 2nd to 4th quartiles, and we observed significant trend (p for trend=0.03). We observed significant interaction of PAID score and HbA1c with diabetes therapy (p=0.0469). In patients receiving diet only therapy, the RRs for poor glycemic control were 1.38 (95%CI, 0.93-2.05), 1.18 (95%CI, 0.51-5.13), and 1.81 (95%CI, 1.16-2.79), respectively for 2nd to 4th quartiles of PAID score compared with the 1st quartile (p for trend=0.025); while we did not observe significant association between PAID and poor glycemic control in patients receiving medication therapy. Conclusions: Diabetes distress measured by PAID survey was associated with poor glycemic control, and this association was modified by diabetes therapy.
机译:目的:通过糖尿病治疗评估糖尿病问题领域(PAID)量表评分和血糖控制的联合关联。方法:我们使用了3479名1型和2型患者的数据。采用改良的Poisson回归分析来评估四分位数的PAID得分对血糖控制不佳(HbA1c≥7.0%)的相对风险(RRs)。结果:与PAID评分的第一四分位数相比,血糖控制不良的多变量调整后RR为0.99(95%CI,0.87-1.11),1.05(95%CI,0.93-1.18)和1.12(95%CI,1.00) -1.27)分别针对第二至第四四分位数,并且我们观察到了显着趋势(趋势p = 0.03)。我们观察到PAID评分和HbA1c与糖尿病治疗之间存在显着相互作用(p = 0.0469)。在仅接受饮食疗法的患者中,血糖控制不良的RRs分别为1.38(95%CI,0.93-2.05),1.18(95%CI,0.51-5.13)和1.81(95%CI,1.16-2.79)。 PAID得分的第2至第4个四分位数与第1个四分位数相比(趋势p = 0.025);虽然我们没有观察到接受药物治疗的患者的PAID与血糖控制不良之间存在显着关联。结论:通过PAID调查测量的糖尿病困扰与血糖控制不良有关,并且这种联系通过糖尿病治疗得以改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号