...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Biphasic insulin aspart 30 three times daily is more effective than a twice-daily regimen, without increasing hypoglycemia, in Chinese subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetes drugs.
【24h】

Biphasic insulin aspart 30 three times daily is more effective than a twice-daily regimen, without increasing hypoglycemia, in Chinese subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetes drugs.

机译:在口服降糖药控制不力的中国2型糖尿病患者中,每天两次三剂天冬氨酸30次比每日两次方案更有效,且不会增加低血糖。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of twice- and thrice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in Chinese subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this 24-week, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, treat-to-target study, 321 Chinese insulin-naive subjects with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (fasting blood glucose >or=7.8 mmol/l and A1C >or=7.5%) were randomized (1:1) to twice- or thrice-daily (BID and TID groups, respectively) BIAsp 30 without OADs. Initial insulin doses were based on fasting blood glucose at randomization. Insulin dose was adjusted with algorithm-controlled titration to achieve premeal blood glucose of 4.4-6.1 mmol/l. RESULTS: A1C decreased significantly in both groups (BID group -2.48 +/- 0.07%; TID group -2.81 +/- 0.07%). Thrice-daily BIAsp 30 showed superiority in A1C improvement (-0.33% [95% CI -0.53 to -0.13]; P < 0.01) and helped more subjects achieve A1C targets <7% (BID group 51.3% vs. TID group 65.8%; P < 0.01). Thrice-daily BIAsp 30 was more effective in subjects with baseline A1C >or=9% (<7%: BID group 41.5% vs. TID group 58.3%; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in rates of overall and nocturnal major and minor hypoglycemia per subject year between groups. No significant differences in weight gain (BID group 3.87 +/- 0.28 kg; TID group 4.09 +/- 0.27 kg) and mean daily insulin doses (BID group 0.82 +/- 0.28 units/kg; TID group 0.86 +/- 0.34 units/kg) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Twice- and thrice-daily BIAsp 30 were effective in Chinese insulin-naive subjects with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Thrice-daily BIAsp 30 offered greater reduction in A1C without increasing risk of hypoglycemia, insulin dose, and weight gain, especially in subjects with A1C >or=9%.
机译:目的:评估口服抗糖尿病药物(OADs)控制不佳的中国2型糖尿病患者每日两次和三次双天冬氨酸天冬氨酸30(BIAsp 30)的疗效和安全性。研究设计和方法:在这项为期24周的多中心,平行组,随机,针对性研究中,研究对象为321位中国未接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病(空腹血糖>或= 7.8 mmol / l和将A1C>或= 7.5%)随机(1:1)分配给每天两次或三次(分别为BID和TID组)BIAsp 30,无OAD。初始胰岛素剂量基于随机分配的空腹血糖。通过算法控制的滴定调节胰岛素剂量,使餐前血糖达到4.4-6.1 mmol / l。结果:两组的A1C均显着下降(BID组为-2.48 +/- 0.07%; TID组为-2.81 +/- 0.07%)。每天有三次BIAsp 30表现出A1C改善的优势(-0.33%[95%CI -0.53至-0.13]; P <0.01),并帮助更多的受试者实现了<7%的A1C目标(BID组51.3%与TID组65.8%) ; P <0.01)。基线A1C≥9%(<7%:BID组41.5%,TID组58.3%; P <0.01)的患者,每天三次三次BIAsp 30更有效。两组之间每个受试者年的总体,夜间主要和次要低血糖发生率没有显着差异。体重增加(BID组3.87 +/- 0.28公斤; TID组4.09 +/- 0.27公斤)和平均每日胰岛素剂量(BID组0.82 +/- 0.28单位/ kg; TID组0.86 +/- 0.34单位)无显着差异/ kg)。结论:每天两次和三次BIAsp 30在2型糖尿病控制不佳的中国未接受胰岛素治疗的受试者中有效。每天三次,BIAsp 30可以使A1C降低更多,而不会增加低血糖,胰岛素剂量和体重增加的风险,尤其是在A1C≥9%的受试者中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号