首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Clinically useful estimates of insulin sensitivity during pregnancy: validation studies in women with normal glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus.
【24h】

Clinically useful estimates of insulin sensitivity during pregnancy: validation studies in women with normal glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus.

机译:妊娠期胰岛素敏感性的临床有用估计:对糖耐量正常且妊娠糖尿病的女性进行的验证研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: We examined whether selected indexes of insulin sensitivity derived from an oral glucose tolerance test (IS(OGTT)) or fasting glucose/insulin levels (IS(QUICKI) and IS(HOMA)) can be used to predict insulin sensitivity in women before and during pregnancy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 2-h euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (5 mmol/l glucose, 40 mU. m(-2). min(-1) insulin) and a 120-min oral glucose tolerance test (75 g load pregravid, 100 g pregnant) were repeated on 15 women (10 with normal glucose tolerance [NGT] and 5 with gestational diabetes mellitus [GDM]) pregravid and during both early (12-14 weeks) and late (34-36 weeks) pregnancy. An index of insulin sensitivity derived from the clamp (IS(CLAMP)) was obtained from glucose infusion rates adjusted for change in fat-free mass and endogenous glucose production measured using [6,6(-2)H(2)]glucose. RESULTS: Univariate analysis using combined groups and periods of pregnancy resulted in significant correlations between IS(CLAMP) and IS(OGTT) (r(2) = 0.74, P < 0.0001), IS(QUICKI) (r(2) = 0.64, P < 0.0001), and IS(HOMA) (r(2) = 0.53, P < 0.0001). The IS(OGTT) provided a significantly better correlation (P < 0.0001) than either IS(QUICKI) or IS(HOMA.) Multivariate analysis showed a significant group effect (P < 0.0003) on the prediction model, and separate equations were developed for the NGT (r(2) = 0.64, P < 0.0001) and GDM (r(2) = 0.85, P < 0.0001) groups. When subdivided by period of pregnancy, the correlation between IS(CLAMP) and IS(OGTT) pregravid was r(2) = 0.63 (P = 0.0002), during early pregnancy was r(2) = 0.80 (P < 0.0001), and during late pregnancy was r(2) = 0.64 (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of insulin sensitivity from the IS(OGTT) during pregnancy were significantly better than from fasting glucose and insulin values. However, separate prediction equations are necessary for pregnant women with NGT and women with GDM.
机译:目的:我们检查了通过口服葡萄糖耐量试验(IS(OGTT))或空腹血糖/胰岛素水平(IS(QUICKI)和IS(HOMA))得出的胰岛素敏感性的选定指标是否可以用来预测女性的胰岛素敏感性在怀孕期间研究设计和方法:2小时正常血糖-高胰岛素钳夹(5 mmol / l葡萄糖,40 mU。m(-2)。min(-1)胰岛素)和120分钟的口服葡萄糖耐量试验(75 g负荷前瞻性)在怀孕前(12-14周)和晚期(34-36周)怀孕前的15名妇女(10名葡萄糖耐量正常[NGT]和5名妊娠糖尿病[GDM])重复了100克孕妇的妊娠试验。从钳制得到的胰岛素敏感性指数(IS(CLAMP))是根据使用[6,6(-2)H(2)]葡萄糖测得的无脂脂肪量和内源性葡萄糖产量的变化调整的葡萄糖输注速率获得的。结果:使用组合组和妊娠期的单变量分析导致IS(CLAMP)和IS(OGTT)之间存在显着相关性(r(2)= 0.74,P <0.0001),IS(QUICKI)(r(2)= 0.64, P <0.0001)和IS(HOMA)(r(2)= 0.53,P <0.0001)。与IS(QUICKI)或IS(HOMA)相比,IS(OGTT)提供了更好的相关性(P <0.0001)。多变量分析显示,预测模型具有显着的群效应(P <0.0003),并且针对NGT(r(2)= 0.64,P <0.0001)和GDM(r(2)= 0.85,P <0.0001)组。如果按妊娠期进行细分,则IS(CLAMP)和IS(OGTT)前兆之间的相关性为r(2)= 0.63(P = 0.0002),孕早期为r(2)= 0.80(P <0.0001),并且妊娠晚期期间的r(2)= 0.64(P = 0.0002)。结论:妊娠期间通过IS(OGTT)进行的胰岛素敏感性评估明显优于空腹血糖和胰岛素值。但是,NGT孕妇和GDM孕妇需要单独的预测方程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号