首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Contrasting Effects of Lixisenatide and Liraglutide on Postprandial Glycemic Control, Gastric Emptying, and Safety Parameters in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Optimized Insulin Glargine With or Without Metformin: A Randomized, Open-Label Trial
【24h】

Contrasting Effects of Lixisenatide and Liraglutide on Postprandial Glycemic Control, Gastric Emptying, and Safety Parameters in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Optimized Insulin Glargine With or Without Metformin: A Randomized, Open-Label Trial

机译:利西拉来和利拉鲁肽对2型糖尿病患者餐后血糖控制,胃排空和安全性参数在有或无二甲双胍的最佳胰岛素甘精胰岛素中的对比作用:一项随机,开放标签试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVEThis mechanistic trial compared the pharmacodynamics and safety of lixisenatide and liraglutide in combination with optimized insulin glargine with/without metformin in type 2 diabetes (T2D).RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThis was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, three-arm trial comparing lixisenatide 20 mu g and liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg once daily for 8 weeks in combination with insulin glargine after optimized titration. The primary end point was change from baseline to week 8 in incremental area under the postprandial plasma glucose curve for 4 h after a standardized solid breakfast (AUC PPG(0030-0430 h)). Changes from baseline in gastric emptying, 24-h plasma glucose profile, HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 24-h ambulatory heart rate and blood pressure, amylase and lipase levels, and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed.RESULTSIn total, 142 patients were randomized and treated. Lixisenatide 20 mu g achieved greater reductions of AUC PPG(0030-0430 h) compared with liraglutide (marginal mean [95% one-sided CI] treatment difference, -6.0 [-7.8] h mmol/L [-108.3 (-140.0) h mg/dL] vs. liraglutide 1.2 mg and -4.6 [-6.3] h mmol/L [-83.0 (-114.2) h mg/dL] vs. liraglutide 1.8 mg; P < 0.001 for both), and gastric emptying was delayed to a greater extent than with liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg (P < 0.001 for treatment comparisons). FPG was unchanged in all treatment arms. At week 8, mean SD HbA(1c) was 6.2 +/- 0.4% (44 +/- 5 mmol/mol), 6.1 +/- 0.3% (44 +/- 4 mmol/mol), and 6.1 +/- 0.3% (44 +/- 4 mmol/mol) for lixisenatide 20 mu g and liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg, respectively. At week 8, both liraglutide doses increased marginal mean +/- SE 24-h heart rate from baseline by 9 +/- 1 bpm vs. 3 +/- 1 bpm with lixisenatide (P < 0.001). Occurrence of symptomatic hypoglycemia was higher with lixisenatide; gastrointestinal AEs were more common with liraglutide. Lipase levels were significantly increased from baseline with liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg (marginal mean +/- SE increase 21 +/- 7 IU/L for both; P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONSLixisenatide and liraglutide improved glycemic control in optimized insulin glargine-treated T2D albeit with contrasting mechanisms of action and differing safety profiles.
机译:目的该机制研究比较了利西拉来肽和利拉鲁肽与优化的甘精胰岛素联合/不联合二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病(T2D)的药效学和安全性。研究设计和方法这是一项多中心,开放标签,三组试验,比较了利西拉来特经过优化滴定后,与甘精胰岛素合用,每天一次20克,利拉鲁肽1.2和1.8毫克,持续8周。主要终点是在标准固体早餐后4小时(AUC PPG(0030-0430 h))从餐后血浆葡萄糖曲线下的增量区域从基线到第8周的变化。还评估了从基线开始的胃排空,24小时血浆葡萄糖谱,HbA(1c),空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG),24小时动态心律和血压,淀粉酶和脂肪酶水平以及不良事件(AE)的变化结果总共142例患者被随机分组​​并接受治疗。与利拉鲁肽(边缘平均[95%一侧CI]治疗差异为-6.0 [-7.8] h mmol / L [-108.3(-140.0)])相比,20μg利西拉来实现的AUC PPG减少量更大(0030-0430 h) h mg / dL] vs.利拉鲁肽1.2 mg和-4.6 [-6.3] h mmol / L [-83.0(-114.2)h mg / dL] vs.利拉鲁肽1.8 mg;两者均P <0.001),胃排空为与利拉鲁肽1.2和1.8毫克相比,治疗延迟更大(治疗比较,P <0.001)。所有治疗组的FPG均未改变。在第8周时,平均SD HbA(1c)为6.2 +/- 0.4%(44 +/- 5 mmol / mol),6.1 +/- 0.3%(44 +/- 4 mmol / mol)和6.1 +/-利西拉肽20μg和利拉鲁肽1.2和1.8 mg分别为0.3%(44 +/- 4 mmol / mol)。在第8周,两种利拉鲁肽剂量均较基线时的边际平均+/- SE 24-h心率增加了9 +/- 1 bpm,而使用利西拉肽的则为3 +/- 1 bpm(P <0.001)。利西拉来的症状性低血糖发生率更高;胃肠道不良事件与利拉鲁肽更为常见。利拉鲁肽1.2和1.8 mg时,脂肪酶水平较基线水平显着增加(两者的平均均值+/- SE增加21 +/- 7 IU / L; P <0.05)。结论在优化的甘精胰岛素治疗的T2D患者中,利西拉肽和利拉鲁肽改善了血糖控制。尽管有不同的作用机理和不同的安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号