...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetic medicine: A journal of the British Diabetic Association >Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) compared with blood glucose awareness training (BGAT) in poorly controlled Type 1 diabetic patients: long-term effects on HbA moderated by depression. A randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) compared with blood glucose awareness training (BGAT) in poorly controlled Type 1 diabetic patients: long-term effects on HbA moderated by depression. A randomized controlled trial.

机译:控制不佳的1型糖尿病患者的认知行为疗法(CBT)与血糖意识训练(BGAT)的比较:抑郁症对HbA的长期影响。一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness at 6 and 12 months' follow-up of group cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) compared with blood glucose awareness training (BGAT) in poorly controlled Type 1 diabetic patients and to explore the moderating effect of baseline depression. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Adults with Type 1 diabetes (n = 86) with glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) >or= 8% were randomized to CBT or BGAT. Primary outcome was HbA(1c) control. Secondary outcomes were: self-care, diabetes-related distress (Problem Areas in Diabetes scale; PAID), diabetes self-efficacy (Confidence in Diabetes Self-care scale; CIDS) and depressive symptoms (Centre for Epidemiological Studies--Depression scale; CES-D). Measurements were scheduled before CBT and BGAT, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after. Differential effects were analysed for the subgroup of patients reporting low vs. high baseline levels of depression. RESULTS: Neither CBT nor BGAT had a significant impact on HbA(1c) at 6 and 12 months' follow-up. Both interventions resulted in lower depressive symptoms (CES-D 15.7-13.3, P = 0.01) up to 12 months, but only CBT was effective in lowering HbA(1c) in patients with high baseline depression scores (HbA(1c) 9.5-8.8%) up to 1 year of follow-up (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that group CBT can effectively help Type 1 diabetic patients with co-morbid depression achieve and maintain better glycaemic outcomes.
机译:目的:在控制不佳的1型糖尿病患者中,在6个月和12个月的组认知行为治疗(CBT)与血糖意识训练(BGAT)相比,以测试其有效性,并探讨基线抑郁症的缓解作用。研究设计和方法:将糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))≥8%的1型糖尿病(n = 86)成人随机分为CBT或BGAT。主要结果是HbA(1c)控制。次要结果是:自我护理,与糖尿病有关的困扰(糖尿病问题区域量表; PAID),糖尿病自我效能感(糖尿病自我护理量表; CIDS)和抑郁症状(流行病学研究中心-抑郁量表); CES-D)。计划在CBT和BGAT之前以及之后的3、6和12个月进行测量。分析了低和高基线抑郁水平患者亚组的差异作用。结果:在随访6个月和12个月时,CBT和BGAT均未对HbA(1c)产生显着影响。两种干预措施均可在长达12个月的时间内降低抑郁症状(CES-D 15.7-13.3,P = 0.01),但是只有CBT可以有效降低基线抑郁评分高(HbA(1c)9.5-8.8)的患者的HbA(1c) %),最多随访1年(P = 0.03)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,CBT组可以有效地帮助患有合并症的1型糖尿病患者达到并维持更好的血糖结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号