首页> 外文期刊>Developing world bioethics >CAPACITY BUILDING OF ETHICS REVIEW COMMITTEES ACROSS AFRICA BASED ON THE RESULTS OF A COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY
【24h】

CAPACITY BUILDING OF ETHICS REVIEW COMMITTEES ACROSS AFRICA BASED ON THE RESULTS OF A COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY

机译:基于综合需求评估调查结果的整个非洲道德审查委员会的能力建设

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A needs assessment survey of ethics review committees (ERCs) across Africa was conducted in order to establish their major needs and areas of weaknesses in terms of ethical review capacity. The response rate was 84% (31 of 37 targeted committees), and committees surveyed were located in 18 African countries. The majority of the responding committees (61%) have been in existence between 5 and 10 years; approximately 74% of the respondents were institutional committees, with the remainder being either national (6131) or regional (2131). In terms of the ethical review process, nine of the 31 committees that responded did not have standard operating procedures (SOPs), and seven of the 22 that did have SOPs had never revised them after their initial development (an average period of three years). Of the 31 committees, 10 operated without any ethical guidelines. Many of the committees (13/30) met once per month, and the number of proposals reviewed annually varied, ranging from five to over 100. All respondents relied on paper-based data management and archiving systems. Overall, the survey identified the major constraints on ERCs as lack of office equipment, outdated or lack of SOPs, lack of electronic data man-agement systems, inadequate resources, lack of or insufficient expertise on the committees, and poor recognition of the importance of the role of the committees. Consequently, the authors are addressing the identified needs and weaknesses through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded capacity building project. The impact of the intervention project will be assessed during and at the end of the four-year longitudinal project.
机译:为了确定其主要需求和道德审查能力方面的弱点,对非洲的道德审查委员会进行了需求评估调查。答复率为84%(37个目标委员会中的31个),接受调查的委员会位于18个非洲国家。大多数答复委员会(61%)的成立时间为5至10年;大约74%的受访者是机构委员会,其余的是国家(6131)或地区(2131)。在道德审查流程方面,做出回应的31个委员会中有9个没有标准操作程序(SOP),而有SOP的22个委员会中有7个在最初制定后从未对其进行过修订(平均期限为三年) 。在这31个委员会中,有10个在没有任何道德准则的情况下运作。许多委员会(13/30)每月开会一次,每年审查的提案数量从5个到100多个不等。所有答复者都依赖纸质数据管理和归档系统。总体而言,调查确定了对ERC的主要限制因素,包括缺乏办公设备,过时或缺少SOP,缺少电子数据管理系统,资源不足,委员会的专门知识不足或不足以及对ERC重要性的认识不足。委员会的作用。因此,作者正在通过比尔和梅琳达·盖茨基金会资助的能力建设项目来解决已确定的需求和弱点。干预项目的影响将在四年纵向项目期间和结束时进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号