首页> 外文期刊>Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology. >Simplified acute physiology score II/Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation ii and prediction of the mortality and later development of complications in poisoned patients admitted to intensive care unit
【24h】

Simplified acute physiology score II/Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation ii and prediction of the mortality and later development of complications in poisoned patients admitted to intensive care unit

机译:简化的急性生理学评分II /急性生理学和慢性健康评估ii并预测重症监护病房中毒患者的死亡率和并发症的后期发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We aimed to determine the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II and simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II in poisoned patients admitted to the poisoning ICU and compare them to see which is a more sensitive and specific system for prognostication of the mortality and complications in these patients. Between February 2013 and July 2013, all patients referring to our centre with any poisoning mandating ICU admission were prospectively included. On ICU arrival, a questionnaire containing the demographic data, parameters of the APACHE II and SAPS II scores, the sum of the scores, complications during the stay and the patients' final outcome (compete recovery versus death) was filled for every single patient. A total of 195 patients were evaluated. Forty-two patients (21.5%) died. Mean SAPS and APACHE scores were 41 ± 16 and 15 ± 6, respectively. Mean SAPS and APACHE scores were significantly different between the survivors and non-survivors. Both scores could successfully prognosticate the development of the complications (p = 0.07 and 0.013, respectively). APACHE II was a better score in prediction of both mortality and later complications in the setting of poisoning ICU. APACHE >22 has a good specificity in determining the mortality and development of further complications in poisoned patients admitted to the medical toxicology ICUs. SAPS II score >59 and >43 can predict the risk of mortality and later complications in these patients, as well.
机译:我们旨在确定中毒重症监护病房(ICU)中毒患者的急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II和简化的急性生理评分(SAPS)II,并进行比较,以了解哪种方法对死亡的预后更为敏感和具体和这些患者的并发症。在2013年2月至2013年7月之间,所有纳入ICU入院的中毒患者均被包括在内。 ICU抵达后,为每位患者填写了一份包含人口统计数据,APACHE II和SAPS II评分参数,评分总和,住院期间并发症以及患者最终结果(竞争恢复与死亡)的问卷。总共对195名患者进行了评估。四十二名患者(21.5%)死亡。 SAPS和APACHE的平均得分分别为41±16和15±6。幸存者和非幸存者之间的平均SAPS和APACHE得分显着不同。两项评分均可成功预测并发症的发生(分别为p = 0.07和0.013)。 APACHE II在中毒加护病房的死亡率和后期并发症的预测中得分更高。 APACHE> 22在确定接受药物毒理学ICU的中毒患者的死亡率和进一步并发症的发生方面具有良好的特异性。 SAPS II评分> 59和> 43也可以预测这些患者的死亡风险和以后发生的并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号