首页> 外文期刊>Desalination: The International Journal on the Science and Technology of Desalting and Water Purification >Comparison of effectiveness of methylene blue decomposition using pristine and carbon-coated TiO2 in a photocatalytic membrane reactor
【24h】

Comparison of effectiveness of methylene blue decomposition using pristine and carbon-coated TiO2 in a photocatalytic membrane reactor

机译:在光催化膜反应器中使用原始和碳包覆的TiO2分解亚甲基蓝的功效比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A comparison of effectiveness of methylene blue (MB) decomposition using pristine (ST-01) and carbon-coated (SP-70-900) TiO2 in a photocatalytic membrane reactor (PMR) combining photocatalysis and direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) is presented. In the first step of the research the effect of the addition of a photocatalyst to a feed on the permeate flux was investigated. The presence of pristine TiO2 did not affect the flux, regardless of the catalyst concentration applied. During the process performed with carbon-coated TiO2 a deterioration of the process capacity was observed, the most significant at the highest catalyst loading used (i.e. 1 g/dm~3). The flux was lowered for ca. 10-25%, dependent on catalyst concentration. For the catalyst loading <0.5 g/dm~3 the carbon-coated TiO2 exhibited higher activity towards MB removal than pristine ST-01. The rate constant at photocatalyst concentration of 0.3 g/dm~3 was higher for ca. 86% and at 0.5 g/dm~3 for ca. 30% when carbon-coated TiO2 was applied instead of ST-01. Moreover, the rate constant of dye decomposition on SP-70-900 in concentration of 0.5 g/dm~3 was only ca. 12% lower than in case of twice higher loading of ST-01 (i.e. 1.0 g/dm~3). A very important advantage of the PMR presented is complete separation of catalyst particles, as well as dye and other non-volatile compounds. Thus, the product (distillate) has higher quality than in case of photocatalysis conducted without MD.
机译:提出了在结合光催化和直接接触膜蒸馏(DCMD)的光催化膜反应器(PMR)中使用原始(ST-01)和碳包覆(SP-70-900)TiO2分解亚甲基蓝(MB)的有效性的比较。在研究的第一步中,研究了向进料中添加光催化剂对渗透通量的影响。原始TiO2的存在不影响通量,无论所用催化剂的浓度如何。在用碳涂覆的TiO 2进行的过程中,观察到处理能力的下降,在所用的最高催化剂负载量(即1g / dm〜3)下最显着。焊剂降低了约。 10-25%,取决于催化剂浓度。对于小于0.5 g / dm〜3的催化剂负载量,碳包覆的TiO2的MB去除活性高于原始ST-01。在约0.3 g / dm〜3的光催化剂浓度下,速率常数较高。大约为86%,浓度为0.5 g / dm〜3时。当使用碳涂层的TiO2代替ST-01时为30%。此外,染料在SP-70-900上的浓度为0.5 g / dm〜3时的分解速率常数仅为约3。与ST-01的两倍高负载(即1.0 g / dm〜3)相比降低了12%。呈现的PMR的一个非常重要的优点是催化剂颗粒以及染料和其他非挥发性化合物的完全分离。因此,与没有MD进行光催化的情况相比,产物(馏出物)具有更高的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号