首页> 外文期刊>Bariatric nursing and surgical patient care: official journal of the National Association of Bariatric Nurses >Ethical Considerations of Quality Improvement and Human Subjects Research: Is There a Slippery Slope?
【24h】

Ethical Considerations of Quality Improvement and Human Subjects Research: Is There a Slippery Slope?

机译:质量改进和人类研究的伦理考虑:是否存在滑坡?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The question of consent presents certain ethical and legal concerns for subjects, investigators, publishers, and end-users of research. In this context, consent in a broad sense is the process that allows a human subject to make decisions with respect to participation in an investigational study. The decision may impact a subject emotionally, physically, or both. As bariatric nursing emerges as an evidenced-based science, nurses have been increasingly active in building this body of evidence. However, distinctions between quality improvement (QI) measures and human subjects research (HSR) can be confusing. Regardless, the underlying theme seeks to recognize the universal requirement to protect subjects from harm. This article examines issues pertaining to consent and a special and vulnerable population. Further, strategies to differentiate between the two categories of investigation are described. Specific examples of QI opportunities are included.
机译:同意问题对受试者,研究人员,出版商和研究的最终用户提出了某些伦理和法律方面的关注。在这种情况下,广泛意义上的同意是允许人类受试者就参与研究进行决策的过程。该决定可能会在情感上,身体上或两者上影响对象。随着减肥护理成为循证科学的发展,护士在建立这一证据体系方面越来越活跃。但是,质量改进(QI)措施与人体研究(HSR)之间的区别可能会令人困惑。无论如何,基本主题都试图承认保护受试者免受伤害的普遍要求。本文研究与同意以及特殊弱势群体有关的问题。此外,描述了区分两类调查的策略。包括QI机会的具体示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号