首页> 外文期刊>Dental traumatology: official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology >Influence of wire extension and type on splint rigidity - evaluation by a dynamic and a static measuring method.
【24h】

Influence of wire extension and type on splint rigidity - evaluation by a dynamic and a static measuring method.

机译:电线延伸和类型对夹板刚度的影响-通过动态和静态测量方法进行评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract - Objectives: To evaluate the influence of wire dimension and wire length on the splint rigidity of wire-composite splints in vitro. Materials and Methods: A custom-made artificial model was used. The central incisors simulated 'injured' teeth with increased mobility, and the lateral incisors and canines served as 'uninjured' teeth with physiological mobility. To assess horizontal and vertical tooth mobility before and after splinting, the Periotest and Zwick methods were applied. Teeth 13-23 were splinted using wire-composite splint 1 (WCS1; Dentaflex 0.45 mm) and wire-composite splint 2 (WCS2; Strengtheners 0.8 x 1.8 mm). Splint length was varied by successively shortening the wire. The influence of wire dimension was tested using t-test and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test with the Bonferroni-Holm procedure (alpha = 0.05). To test the influence of wire length, anova and Kruskal-Wallis tests as well as Tukey range and Wilcoxon test with Bonferroni-Holm procedure were applied (alpha = 0.05). Results: Wire dimension significantly influenced splint rigidity (P < 0.05). The wire length significantly influenced the splint rigidity of WCS1 in the horizontal dimension and WCS2 in the horizontal and vertical dimensions (P < 0.05). Splint rigidity was significantly reduced when splinting only 'injured' teeth compared with splints including 'uninjured' adjacent teeth (P < 0.05). No differences were found between splints including one or two 'uninjured' teeth on each side (P > 0.05). Conclusion: WCS1 is flexible compared with the more rigid WCS2. The wire length influences the rigidity. To ensure adequate fixation and reduce the risk of enamel damage during splint removal, the splint should include only one 'uninjured' tooth bilaterally.
机译:摘要-目的:评价线材尺寸和长度对体外复合线夹板的夹板刚度的影响。材料和方法:使用定制的人造模型。中切牙模拟活动性增强的“受伤”牙齿,而侧切牙和犬齿则具有生理活动性“未受伤”牙齿。为了评估夹板前后的水平和垂直牙齿移动性,使用了Periotest和Zwick方法。使用金属丝复合夹板1(WCS1; Dentaflex 0.45 mm)和金属丝复合夹板2(WCS2;增强剂0.8 x 1.8 mm)将牙齿13-23夹板。通过依次缩短导线来改变夹板长度。使用t检验和Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验以及Bonferroni-Holm程序(α= 0.05)来测试线径的影响。为了测试导线长度的影响,采用了方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验以及Tukey测距和Bonferroni-Holm程序进行的Wilcoxon检验(α= 0.05)。结果:导线尺寸显着影响夹板刚度(P <0.05)。导线长度在水平方向显着影响WCS1的夹板刚度,在水平和垂直方向显着影响WCS2的夹板刚度(P <0.05)。与仅包括“未受伤”的相邻牙齿的夹板相比,仅夹住“受伤”的牙齿时,夹板的刚度显着降低(P <0.05)。夹板之间无差异,每侧包括一颗或两颗“未受伤”的牙齿(P> 0.05)。结论:与更严格的WCS2相比,WCS1具有灵活性。导线长度会影响刚度。为确保充分固定并减少夹板移除过程中牙釉质受损的风险,夹板的两侧应仅包括一颗“未受伤”的牙齿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号