...
首页> 外文期刊>HIV medicine >Diagnosing HIV infection in patients presenting with glandular fever-like illness in primary care: Are we missing primary HIV infection?
【24h】

Diagnosing HIV infection in patients presenting with glandular fever-like illness in primary care: Are we missing primary HIV infection?

机译:在基层医疗机构中对患有腺热样疾病的患者进行HIV感染诊断:我们是否缺少原发性HIV感染?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of HIV infection in patients presenting in primary care with glandular fever (GF)-like illness. Methods: Samples from primary care submitted for a GF screen between April 2009 and June 2010 were identified. Samples without an HIV request were anonymized and retrospectively tested using a 4th-generation HIV antigen/antibody screening test. Reactive samples were further confirmed by an HIV antibody only test, with or without a p24 antigen assay. Antibody avidity testing based on the Recent HIV Infection Testing Algorithm (RITA) was used to identify individuals with evidence of recent acquisition (within 4-5 months). Results: Of 1046 GF screening requests, concomitant HIV requests were made in 119 patients. Excluding one known positive patient, 2.5% (three of 118) tested HIV positive. Forty-five (4.3%) had a subsequent HIV test through another consultation within 1 year; of these, 4.4% (two of 45) tested positive. Of the remaining 882 patients, 694 (78.7%) had samples available for unlinked anonymous HIV testing, of which six (0.9%) tested positive. The overall HIV prevalence was 1.3% (11 of 857), with 72.7% (eight of 11) of cases missed at initial primary care presentation. Four of the nine (44.4%) available positive samples had evidence of recent acquisition, with three (75.0%) missed at initial primary care presentation. Conclusion: Low levels of HIV testing in patients presenting in primary care with GF-like illness are resulting in a significant number of missed HIV and seroconversion diagnoses. Local policy should consider adopting an opt-out strategy to include HIV testing routinely within the GF-screening investigation panel.
机译:目的:该研究的目的是检查在以腺热(GF)样疾病进行初级护理的患者中的HIV感染率。方法:确定了从2009年4月至2010年6月之间进行GF筛查的初级保健样本。对没有HIV要求的样品进行匿名处理,并使用第四代HIV抗原/抗体筛选测试进行回顾性测试。通过有或没有p24抗原测定的仅HIV抗体测试进一步证实了反应性样品。基于最近的HIV感染测试算法(RITA)的抗体亲和力测试用于识别有近期感染证据的个体(4-5个月内)。结果:在1046项GF筛查请求中,有119例患者同时提出了HIV要求。除一名已知的阳性患者外,有2.5%(118名中的三名)检测出HIV阳性。四十五(4.3%)人在一年内通过另一次咨询进行了艾滋病毒检测;其中4.4%(45个中的2个)测试为阳性。在其余的882名患者中,有694名(78.7%)拥有可用于未关联的匿名HIV检测的样本,其中六名(0.9%)呈阳性。总体艾滋病毒感染率为1.3%(857例中的11例),其中72.7%(11例中的8例)在初次基层医疗就诊时漏诊。 9个可用阳性样本中有4个(44.4%)有最近获得的证据,而在初次基层医疗时就漏诊了3个(75.0%)。结论:初次就诊患有GF样疾病的患者中HIV检测水平低,导致大量HIV漏诊和血清转化诊断。当地政策应考虑采用退出策略,将艾滋病毒检测常规纳入GF筛查调查小组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号