首页> 外文期刊>Zoonoses and Public Health >Avian Influenza Outbreak Management: Action at Time of Confirmation, Depopulation and Disposal Methods; the 'Belgian Experience' during the H7N7 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Epidemic in 2003
【24h】

Avian Influenza Outbreak Management: Action at Time of Confirmation, Depopulation and Disposal Methods; the 'Belgian Experience' during the H7N7 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Epidemic in 2003

机译:禽流感暴发管理:确认,减少和处置方法时的行动; 2003年H7N7高致病性禽流感流行期间的“比利时经历”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Eradication of H5 and H7 influenza in a positive flock will include mass depopulation of birds, containment and inactivation of the virus in the carcasses and litter, and decontamination of the facility. A quick response is desired in the event of a disease outbreak. Ideally, birds should be depopulated within 24 h after detecting the virus. Mass depopulation of birds must be performed in a humane manner while minimizing human health and biosecurity risks. In the framework of the European legislation, a number of methods are authorized for the killing of poultry for processing prior to marketing. However, during emergencies such as a disease outbreak, there are fewer options. The current most commonly used procedures for large-scale emergency depopulation of birds consist of exposing poultry to CO or CO(2) gas. Both gasses have been used in Belgium during the H7N7 crisis in 2003. The gassing procedures include whole house gassing, portable panel enclosures, cage cabinets, containers and polyethylene tent method. Whole house gassing requires sealing the house to prevent gas leakage and, using specialized equipment, introducing large volumes of gas evenly over the birds. All procedures are very labour intensive, create a biosecurity risk and require a large number of personnel. There are considerable region-to-region differences in emergency depopulation techniques and disposal of carcasses and infected material. Because of the differences in bird type and species, management, housing and stocking density, it is difficult to propose a depopulation technique that will be suitable for all circumstances. Safety of the human operators is an increasing concern with all H5 and H7 strains and in particular with the highly pathogenic H5N1 strain. Researchers and commercial poultry companies in the United States recently established that non-toxic water-based foam with a certain bubble size presents a practicable, effective and humane method for mass depopulation. Foam of the right bubble size creates an occlusion in the trachea of birds, causing a rapid onset of hypoxia. The foam that blankets the broiler house induces physical hypoxia - the same cause of death as the approved method using carbon dioxide gas (CO(2)). The article illustrates the different culling and disposal methods with a focus on the methods used during the 2003 H7N7 crisis in Belgium.
机译:消灭阳性鸡群中的H5和H7流感将包括禽类大量减少,the体和垫料中病毒的遏制和灭活以及设施的净化。在疾病暴发时需要快速反应。理想情况下,应在检测到病毒后的24小时内将禽鸟减少。鸟类的大规模灭绝必须以人道的方式进行,同时将人类健康和生物安全风险降至最低。在欧洲立法的框架内,已批准了多种方法来杀害在销售前加工的家禽。但是,在诸如疾病暴发之类的紧急情况下,选择较少。当前用于大规模紧急减少家禽数量的最常用程序包括将家禽暴露于CO或CO(2)气体。在2003年的H7N7危机期间,比利时都使用了这两种气体。充气程序包括整个房子的充气,便携式面板外壳,笼式橱柜,容器和聚乙烯帐篷方法。整个鸡舍的放气需要密封鸡舍以防止气体泄漏,并使用专门的设备将大量的气体均匀地引入鸡舍。所有程序都需要大量劳动,会产生生物安全风险,并需要大量人员。紧急人口减少技术以及屠体和感染材料的处置之间存在很大的地区差异。由于鸟类的种类和种类,管理,住房和放养密度的差异,很难提出一种适合所有情况的种群减少技术。对于所有H5和H7菌株,尤其是高致病性H5N1菌株,操作人员的安全性日益受到关注。美国的研究人员和商业家禽公司最近确定,具有一定气泡大小的无毒水基泡沫塑料是一种实用,有效且人道化的人口减少方法。泡沫大小合适的泡沫会在鸟类的气管中形成阻塞,导致缺氧迅速发作。覆盖在肉鸡舍的泡沫会导致身体缺氧-与批准的使用二氧化碳气体(CO(2))的方法相同的死亡原因。本文介绍了不同的剔除和处理方法,重点介绍了2003年比利时H7N7危机期间使用的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号