...
首页> 外文期刊>HTM: Zeitschrift fur Werkstoffe Warmebehandlung Fertigung >Comparison of Alternative Peening Methods for the Improvement of Fatigue Properties of Case-Hardened Steel Parts
【24h】

Comparison of Alternative Peening Methods for the Improvement of Fatigue Properties of Case-Hardened Steel Parts

机译:改善表层硬化钢零件疲劳性能的替代喷丸方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this study, the methods of Water Jet Peening (WJP) and Laser Shock Peening (LSP) were compared to Shot Peening (SP) and investigated in terms of induced residual stresses (RS), microstructure, surface topography and fatigue properties for a case-hardened steel. Different modifications of the surface topography were observed for the different peening methods: after SP, a strong plastic deformation of the surface occurred while the LSP had only a minimal influence on surface topography. After WJP with very high pressure (4500 bar), microscopic damages can occur at the surface. SP leads to the highest compressive RS (up to -1650 MPa) with a maximal affected depth of about 170 μm. After WJP, maximum RS of about -1000 MPa with very low depth (50 μm) are present, while the LSP leads to very large affected depths (< 1 mm) and RS of about -1300 MPa. In terms of fatigue properties, the SP process shows the highest improvement compared to the heat treated state (+47%) while the LSP and the WJP leads to an improvement of +15% and +23% respectively but with larger scatter.
机译:在这项研究中,将喷水喷丸法(WJP)和激光冲击喷丸法(LSP)与喷丸喷丸(SP)的方法进行了比较,并针对一种情况对诱导残余应力(RS),微观结构,表面形貌和疲劳特性进行了研究。 -硬化钢。对于不同的喷丸方法,观察到了表面形貌的不同变化:SP后,表面发生了强烈的塑性变形,而LSP对表面形貌的影响很小。在高压(4500 bar)高压下进行WJP处理后,表面可能会发生微观损伤。 SP导致最高的压缩RS(高达-1650 MPa),最大受影响深度约为170μm。在WJP之后,出现的最大RS约为-1000 MPa,深度很低(50μm),而LSP导致受影响的深度很大(<1 mm),RS约为-1300 MPa。在疲劳性能方面,与热处理状态相比,SP工艺显示出最高的改善(+ 47%),而LSP和WJP分别带来了+ 15%和+ 23%的改善,但散布更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号