首页> 外文期刊>Human Reproduction >A randomized clinical trial of clomiphene citrate versus low dose recombinant FSH for ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination cycles for unexplained and male subfertility.
【24h】

A randomized clinical trial of clomiphene citrate versus low dose recombinant FSH for ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination cycles for unexplained and male subfertility.

机译:柠檬酸克罗米芬与低剂量重组FSH在无法解释和男性不育的子宫内授精周期中过度刺激卵巢的随机临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a widely accepted treatment for unexplained and male subfertility. No consensus exists about the drug of first choice to be used as hyperstimulation. This randomized multicentre trial using a parallel design compares the efficacy of clomiphene citrate (CC) with that of recombinant FSH (rFSH). METHODS: Couples with primary unexplained or male subfertility were randomized to receive CC or rFSH for ovarian hyperstimulation. The treatment was continued for up to four cycles unless pregnancy occurred. Cycles with more than three follicles were cancelled. Cumulative pregnancy rates and live birth rates were primary outcomes. Cancellation during treatment and multiple birth rates are secondary outcomes. Results were analysed following the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Seventy couples with male subfertility and 68 couples with unexplained subfertility were included. Seventy-one women received CC, and 67 received rFSH. Twenty-seven pregnancies were observed in the CC group (38%) and 23 in the rFSH group (34.3%) relative risk (RR) 1.11 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.71-1.73]. The live birth rate was 28.2% (20/71) and 26.9% (18/67) for CC and rFSH, respectively, RR 1.05 (95% CI 0.61-1.80). Overall, the live birth rates per cycle were 10% for CC-stimulated and 8.7% for rFSH stimulated cycles. The total multiple pregnancy rate was 6.0%. Thirty-five cycles (8.6%) were cancelled because of four or more follicles (CC, n = 17; rFSH, n = 18). CONCLUSIONS: In couples with primary unexplained or male subfertility participating in an IUI program, ovarian hyperstimulation can be achieved by CC or rFSH. No significant difference in live birth rates between CC and rFSH was observed. Being less expensive, CC seems the more cost-effective drug and therefore, can be offered as drug of first choice.
机译:背景:宫腔内人工授精(IUI)控制性卵巢过度刺激是无法解释的男性不育症的一种广泛接受的治疗方法。对于用作过度刺激的首选药物尚无共识。这项采用平行设计的随机多中心试验比较了柠檬酸克罗米芬(CC)与重组FSH(rFSH)的疗效。方法:将原发性原因不明或男性不育的夫妇随机分配接受CC或rFSH进行卵巢过度刺激。除非怀孕,否则治疗要持续四个周期。取消了三个以上卵泡的循环。累积妊娠率和活产率是主要结果。治疗期间取消治疗和多胎出生率是次要结果。按照意向治疗原则分析结果。结果:包括男性不育70对夫妇和68对原因不明的不育夫妇。 71名妇女接受了CC,67名接受了rFSH。 CC组(38%)观察到27例怀孕,rFSH组(23%)观察到23例(34.3%)相对风险(RR)1.11 [95%置信区间(95%CI)0.71-1.73]。 CC和rFSH的活产率分别为28.2%(20/71)和26.9%(18/67),RR为1.05(95%CI 0.61-1.80)。总体而言,CC刺激的每个周期的活产率为10%,rFSH刺激的周期为8.7%。多胎妊娠总数为6.0%。由于四个或更多卵泡(CC,n = 17; rFSH,n = 18),取消了三十五个周期(8.6%)。结论:在患有不明原因的原发性或男性不育症的夫妇中,通过IUI计划,可以通过CC或rFSH实现卵巢过度刺激。 CC和rFSH之间的活产率没有显着差异。由于价格便宜,CC似乎是更具成本效益的药物,因此可以作为首选药物提供。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号