...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Inter-comparison of two land-surface models applied at different scales and their feedbacks while coupled with a regional climate model
【24h】

Inter-comparison of two land-surface models applied at different scales and their feedbacks while coupled with a regional climate model

机译:两种比较不同规模的陆地表面模型的比较,以及它们的反馈,同时还结合了区域气候模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Downstream models are often used in order to study regional impacts of climate and climate change on the land surface. For this purpose, they are usually driven offline (i.e., 1-way) with results from regional climate models (RCMs). However, the offline approach does not allow for feedbacks between these models. Thereby, the land surface of the downstream model is usually completely different to the land surface which is used within the RCM. Thus, this study aims at investigating the inconsistencies that arise when driving a downstream model offline instead of interactively coupled with the RCM, due to different feedbacks from the use of different land surface models (LSM). Therefore, two physically based LSMs which developed from different disciplinary backgrounds are compared in our study: while the NOAH-LSM was developed for the use within RCMs, PROMET was originally developed to answer hydrological questions on the local to regional scale. Thereby, the models use different physical formulations on different spatial scales and different parameterizations of the same land surface processes that lead to inconsistencies when driving PROMET offline with RCM output. Processes that contribute to these inconsistencies are, as described in this study, net radiation due to land use related albedo and emissivity differences, the redistribution of this net radiation over sensible and latent heat, for example, due to different assumptions about land use impermeability or soil hydraulic reasons caused by different plant and soil parameterizations. As a result, simulated evapotranspiration, e.g., shows considerable differences of max. 280 mm yr ~(-1). For a full interactive coupling (i.e., 2-way) between PROMET and the atmospheric part of the RCM, PROMET returns the land surface energy fluxes to the RCM and, thus, provides the lower boundary conditions for the RCM subsequently. Accordingly, the RCM responses to the replacement of the LSM with overall increased annual mean near surface air temperature (+1 K) and less annual precipitation (-56 mm) with different spatial and temporal behaviour. Finally, feedbacks can set up positive and negative effects on simulated evapotranspiration, resulting in a decrease of evapotranspiration South of the Alps a moderate increase North of the Alps. The inconsistencies are quantified and account for up to 30% from July to Semptember when focused to an area around Milan, Italy.
机译:通常使用下游模型来研究气候和气候变化对陆地表面的区域影响。为此,通常使用区域气候模型(RCM)的结果将它们离线(即1路)行驶。但是,离线方法不允许这些模型之间的反馈。因此,下游模型的陆地表面通常与RCM中使用的陆地表面完全不同。因此,本研究旨在调查由于使用不同的地表模型(LSM)而产生的不同反馈导致离线驱动下游模型而不是与RCM交互耦合时出现的不一致。因此,在我们的研究中比较了两个基于不同学科背景的基于物理的LSM:虽然NOAH-LSM是为在RCM中使用而开发的,但PROMET最初是为在地方到区域范围内回答水文问题而开发的。因此,这些模型在不同的空间尺度上使用了不同的物理公式,并且在同一土地表面过程中使用了不同的参数化设置,导致在带RCM输出离线驱动PROMET时导致不一致。如本研究所述,导致这些不一致的过程是由于与土地利用相关的反照率和发射率差异而导致的净辐射,例如由于对土地利用不可渗透性的不同假设或在不同的假设下,净辐射在感热和潜热上的重新分布。不同植物和土壤参数化导致的土壤水力原因。结果,例如,模拟的蒸散显示出极大的差异。 280毫米yr〜(-1)。对于PROMET与RCM大气部分之间的完全交互式耦合(即2路),PROMET将陆面能量通量返回给RCM,从而为RCM提供了较低的边界条件。因此,RCM对LSM的替换做出了响应,在不同的时空行为下,地表附近气温总体年均升高(+1 K),年降水量较少(-56 mm)。最后,反馈可以对模拟的蒸散量产生正面和负面的影响,导致阿尔卑斯山以南的蒸散量减少,阿尔卑斯山以北的适度增加。对不一致之处进行了量化,将重点放在意大利米兰附近的地区时,从7月到Semptember最多占30%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号