首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Hydrological response to different time scales of climatological drought: an evaluation of the Standardized Precipitation Index in a mountainous Mediterranean basin
【24h】

Hydrological response to different time scales of climatological drought: an evaluation of the Standardized Precipitation Index in a mountainous Mediterranean basin

机译:不同时间尺度气候干旱的水文响应:地中海山区山区标准化降水指数的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

At present, the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) is the most widely used drought index to provide good estimations about the intensity, magnitude and spatial extent of droughts. The main advantage of the SPI in comparison with other indices is the fact that the SPI enables both determination of drought conditions at different time scales and monitoring of different drought types. It is widely accepted that SPI time scales affect different sub-systems in the hydrological cycle due to the fact that the response of the different water usable sources to precipitation shortages can be very different. The long time scales of SPI are related to hydrological droughts (river flows and reservoir storages). Nevertheless, few analyses empirically verify these statements or the usefulness of the SPI time scales to monitor drought. In this paper, the SPI at different time scales is compared with surface hydrological variables in a big closed basin located in the central Spanish Pyrenees. We provide evidence about the way in which the longer (> 12 months) SPI time scales may not be useful for drought quantification in this area. In general, the surface flows respond to short SPI time scales whereas the reservoir storages respond to longer time scales (7-10 months). Nevertheless, important seasonal differences can be identified in the SPI-usable water sources relationships. This suggests that it is necessary to test the drought indices and time scales in relation to their usefulness for monitoring different drought types under different environmental conditions and water demand situations.
机译:当前,标准降水指数(SPI)是使用最广泛的干旱指数,可以提供有关干旱的强度,强度和空间范围的良好估计。与其他指标相比,SPI的主要优势在于SPI既可以确定不同时间范围内的干旱状况,又可以监视不同的干旱类型。 SPI时间尺度会影响水文循环中的不同子系统,这一事实已被广泛接受,因为不同的水源对降水短缺的响应可能会非常不同。 SPI的长期尺度与水文干旱(河流流量和水库)有关。然而,很少有分析能够凭经验证明这些说法或SPI时间尺度对干旱监测的有用性。在本文中,将不同时间尺度的SPI与位于西班牙比利牛斯山脉中部的大型封闭盆地中的地表水文变量进行了比较。我们提供了有关更长(> 12个月)SPI时间尺度可能对该区域的干旱定量有用的方式的证据。通常,地表水流对较短的SPI时间尺度响应,而储层存储对较长的时间尺度(7-10个月)响应。但是,可以在SPI可用的水源关系中确定重要的季节性差异。这表明有必要测试干旱指数和时标与它们在监测不同环境条件和需水情况下监测不同干旱类型的有用性有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号