...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Ecology >Upland Farming Systems Coping with Uncertain Rainfall in the Central Dry Zone of Myanmar: How Stable is Indigenous Multiple Cropping Under Semi-Arid Conditions?
【24h】

Upland Farming Systems Coping with Uncertain Rainfall in the Central Dry Zone of Myanmar: How Stable is Indigenous Multiple Cropping Under Semi-Arid Conditions?

机译:缅甸中部旱区旱作系统应对不确定的降雨:在半干旱条件下,原住民多种作物的稳定性如何?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A semi-arid climate that has relatively low and uncertain rainfall, 500 to 1,000 mm per year with a coefficient of variation greater than 0.2, is a harsh ecological condition for rural people engaging in rain-fed farming in the tropics. Unstable production of rain-fed farming in African and Asian dry regions has been widely reported, for example, maize and sorghum in Zimbabwe, Malawi, and Zambia at the national and village levels (Scoones et al. 1996; Takane 2006; Kajoba 2008; Lekprichakul 2008), and rain-fed paddy farming in Northeast Thailand on the village level (Kaida et al. 1985; Miyagawa and Kuroda 1988). Rural people in such dry regions in developing countries have generally diversified income sources to mitigate ecological and market risks by integrating crop production, animal husbandry, and non-farm activities (Scoones 1995; Ellis 2000; Uphoff 2002). Additionally, social networks such as mutual aid within kinship groups as well as among wider social groups contribute to stabilizing livelihoods under uncertain conditions (Berry 1989; Shimada 1999). In addition, farmers often combine a variety of crops to cope with fluctuations in climatic and economic conditions (Devendra and Thomas 2002). Such multiple crop farming could limit the negative impact of an ecological risk on farm households, but crop diversity does not prevent outbreaks of crop disease or pests (Goldman 1995). Using data from farm experiments or analyses of farmers’ perceptions, a number of previous studies have suggested that intercropping and mixed cropping can achieve higher stability of total outputs and income than monoculture (Francis and Sanders 1978; Sugimura 1987; Francis 1989; Kajoba 2009). However, few studies have examined in depth how and to what extent multiple cropping systems reduce ecological risk and increase the stability of production in rural villages and farm households.
机译:半干旱气候具有相对较低且不确定的降雨,每年500至1,000 mm,变异系数大于0.2,对于在热带地区从事雨养农业的农村居民来说,这是严峻的生态条件。在非洲和亚洲干旱地区,雨养农业生产不稳定,据报导,例如津巴布韦,马拉维和赞比亚的玉米和高粱在国家和乡村两级(Scoones等人,1996; Takane,2006; Kajoba,2008; Kan,2008)。 Lekprichakul 2008),以及泰国东北部村级雨养水稻种植(Kaida等,1985; Miyagawa和Kuroda,1988)。在发展中国家这样的干旱地区,农村人民普遍拥有多样化的收入来源,通过整合作物生产,畜牧业和非农活动来减轻生态和市场风险(Scoones 1995; Ellis 2000; Uphoff 2002)。此外,诸如亲属群体内部以及更广泛的社会群体之间的互助之类的社会网络有助于在不确定的条件下稳定生活(Berry 1989; Shimada 1999)。此外,农民通常结合多种作物来应对气候和经济条件的波动(Devendra和Thomas 2002)。这种多种农作物的种植可以限制生态风险对农户的负面影响,但是农作物的多样性并不能阻止农作物病虫害的爆发(Goldman 1995)。使用来自农场实验的数据或对农民的看法进行的分析,许多先前的研究表明,套作和混作比单一种植可实现更高的总产出和收入稳定性(Francis和Sanders 1978; Sugimura 1987; Francis 1989; Kajoba 2009) 。但是,很少有研究深入研究多种种植系统如何以及在何种程度上降低生态风险并提高农村村庄和农户的生产稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号