...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Heredity >Efficient adaptively weighted analysis of secondary phenotypes in case-control genome-wide association studies
【24h】

Efficient adaptively weighted analysis of secondary phenotypes in case-control genome-wide association studies

机译:在病例对照全基因组关联研究中对二级表型进行有效的自适应加权分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We propose and compare methods of analysis for detecting associations between genotypes of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and a dichotomous secondary phenotype (X), when the data arise from a case-control study of a primary dichotomous phenotype (D), which is not rare. We considered both a dichotomous genotype (G) as in recessive or dominant models and an additive genetic model based on the number of minor alleles present. To estimate the log odds ratio β 1 relating X to G in the general population, one needs to understand the conditional distribution [D | X, G] in the general population. For the most general model, [D | X, G], one needs external data on P(D = 1) to estimate β 1. We show that for this 'full model', the maximum likelihood (FM) corresponds to a previously proposed weighted logistic regression (WL) approach if G is dichotomous. For the additive model, WL yields results numerically close, but not identical, to those of the maximum likelihood FM. Efficiency can be gained by assuming that [D | X, G] is a logistic model with no interaction between X and G (the 'reduced model'). However, the resulting maximum likelihood (RM) can be misleading in the presence of interactions. We therefore propose an adaptively weighted approach (AW) that captures the efficiency of RM but is robust to the occasional SNP that might interact with the secondary phenotype to affect the risk of the primary disease. We study the robustness of FM, WL, RM and AW to misspecification of P(D = 1). In principle, one should be able to estimate β 1 without external information on P(D = 1) under the reduced model. However, our simulations show that the resulting inference is unreliable. Therefore, in practice one needs to introduce external information on P(D = 1), even in the absence of interactions between X and G.
机译:我们提出并比较分析方法,用于检测单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因型与二分型第二表型(X)之间的关联性,当数据来自于主要二分型表型(D)的病例对照研究时,不罕见。我们既考虑了隐性或显性模型中的二分基因型(G),又考虑了基于存在的次要等位基因数量的加性遗传模型。要估算一般人群中X与G相关的对数优势比β1,需要了解条件分布[D | X,G]。对于最通用的型号,[D | X,G],则需要P(D = 1)上的外部数据来估计β1。我们证明,对于这种“完整模型”,如果满足以下条件,则最大似然(FM)对应于先前提出的加权逻辑回归(WL)方法G是二分法。对于加性模型,WL得出的结果在数值上与最大似然FM的结果接近,但不完全相同。可以通过假设[D | X,G]是逻辑模型,X和G之间没有交互(“简化模型”)。但是,在存在交互作用时,最终的最大似然(RM)可能会产生误导。因此,我们提出了一种自适应加权方法(AW),该方法可捕获RM的效率,但对于偶尔的SNP可能很健壮,而SNP可能与继发表型相互作用,从而影响原发性疾病的风险。我们研究了FM,WL,RM和AW对P(D = 1)错误指定的鲁棒性。原则上,在简化模型下,无需外部信息就可以估计β1(P = 1)。但是,我们的仿真表明,得出的推论是不可靠的。因此,实际上,即使没有X和G之间的相互作用,也需要引入有关P(D = 1)的外部信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号