首页> 外文期刊>Hospital pharmacy. >Dietary Supplements: Defective Products, Defective Standards
【24h】

Dietary Supplements: Defective Products, Defective Standards

机译:膳食补充剂:次品,次品标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Lately, the biggest topic in the herbal medicine/ dietary supplement arena seems to be the quality of supplements sold on store shelves. This has been an issue of concern and sometimes quite heated debate for a long time, but the flames were fanned in February 2015. The New York Attorney General's office sent "cease and desist" letters to several major retailers that were selling dietary supplements, based on a study showing that a majority of the supplements did not contain what they were labeled as containing.1 This was no surprise to most pharmacists and other health care practitioners. Problems with quality in the supplement industry have existed as long as the industry, back beyond the snake-oil salesmen in the old West to the times when one could purchase bones of saints or magical amulets to ward off cholera-causing demons. But the result raised quite a few eyebrows because, if we are going to rely on science, then the science needs to be accurate and as clear-cut as possible; and many practitioners and researchers had serious questions about the appropriateness of the sole identification test used in the study - DNA barcoding.
机译:最近,在草药/膳食补充剂领域,最大的话题似乎是在货架上出售的补充剂的质量。这一直是一个令人关注的问题,有时甚至是很长时间以来的激烈辩论,但这种火焰在2015年2月散开了。纽约总检察长办公室向多家主要销售膳食补充剂的主要零售商发送了“停止并停止”信。一项研究表明,大多数补品不包含标有其含量的药物。1这对于大多数药剂师和其他医疗保健从业人员而言并不奇怪。补品行业的质量问题一直存在,一直到旧西方的蛇油推销员,一直到人们可以购买圣徒或魔咒护身符来抵御引起霍乱的恶魔的时代。但是结果引起了很多人的注意,因为如果我们要依靠科学,那么科学就需要尽可能准确和清晰。并且许多从业者和研究人员对这项研究中使用的唯一识别测试-DNA条码的适当性提出了严重的疑问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号