首页> 外文期刊>Homeopathy: the journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy >Homeopathy in rural Australian primary health care: A survey of general practitioner referral and practice in rural and regional New South Wales, Australia
【24h】

Homeopathy in rural Australian primary health care: A survey of general practitioner referral and practice in rural and regional New South Wales, Australia

机译:澳大利亚农村初级卫生保健中的顺势疗法:对澳大利亚新南威尔士州农村和地区的全科医生转诊和执业情况的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: Homeopathy has attracted considerable recent attention from the Australian conventional medical community. However, despite such increased attention there has been little exploration of the interface between homeopathy and Australian conventional medical practice. This article addresses this research gap by exploring homeopathic practice and referral by rural and regional Australian general practitioners (GPs). Materials and methods: A 27-item questionnaire was sent to all 1486 GPs currently practising in rural and regional New South Wales, Australia (response rate 40.7%). Results: Few GPs in this study utilised homeopathy in their personal practice, with only 0.5% of GPs prescribing homeopathy in the past 12 months, and 8.5% referring patients for homeopathic treatment at least a few times over the past 12 months. Nearly two-thirds of GPs (63.9%) reported that they would not refer for homeopathy under any circumstances. Being in a remote location, receiving patient requests for homeopathy, observing positive responses from homeopathy previously, using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners as information sources, higher levels of knowledge of homeopathy, and being interested in increasing CAM knowledge were all independently predictive of increased referral to homeopathy amongst GPs in this study. GPs in this study were less likely to refer to homeopathy if they used peer-reviewed literature as the major source of their information on CAM. Conclusions: Homeopathy is not integrated significantly in rural general practice either via GP utilisation or referral. There is significant opposition to homeopathy referral amongst rural and regional GPs, though some level of interaction with homeopathic providers exists.
机译:简介:顺势疗法最近引起了澳大利亚常规医学界的广泛关注。然而,尽管这种关注得到了越来越多的关注,但对顺势疗法与澳大利亚传统医学实践之间的关系却鲜有探索。本文通过探讨顺势疗法实践以及澳大利亚农村和地区全科医生(GPs)的推荐来解决这一研究空白。材料和方法:向目前在澳大利亚新南威尔士州农村和地区执业的所有1486名GP寄发了27项问卷(答复率为40.7%)。结果:在这项研究中,很少有全科医生在他们的个人实践中使用顺势疗法,在过去的12个月中只有0.5%的GP规定进行顺势疗法,而在过去的12个月中,至少有8.5%的患者转介了顺势疗法。近三分之二的全科医生(63.9%)报告说,他们在任何情况下都不会转介顺势疗法。在偏远地区,接受患者对顺势疗法的要求,之前观察到顺势疗法的积极反应,使用补充和替代医学(CAM)医师作为信息源,对顺势疗法的了解更高,并且对增加CAM知识的兴趣都是独立预测的在这项研究中,全科医生转诊顺势疗法的比例增加。如果本研究中的GP使用同行评审的文献作为其CAM信息的主要来源,则他们不太可能提及顺势疗法。结论:通过GP的利用或转诊,顺势疗法在农村的普通实践中并未显着整合。尽管与顺势疗法提供者之间存在一定程度的互动,但在农村和地区的全科医生中强烈反对顺势疗法转诊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号