首页> 外文期刊>Hoard's Dairyman >Who wins and loses without classified prixing?
【24h】

Who wins and loses without classified prixing?

机译:如果没有分类定价,谁输赢?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IF CLASSIFIED pricing and pooling were originally created by farmers in the late 1800s to improve their prices, does that duo still achieve those goals in 2013? If the government agreed in the 1930s to enforce this cooperative pricing system because,farmers lacked the market power to fairly negotiate prices with buyers, does this market power imbalance still exist? Price benefit boils down to two questions. One, do we still think that consumer demand for fluid milk products is the most inelastic ofdairy demands? Two, is the demand for Class I products large enough to produce a noticeable benefit? In other words, are we pushing on the right lever, and do we get enough lift to justify the effort?
机译:如果分类定价和合并最初是由农民在1800年代后期创建的,目的是提高价格,那么二人组合在2013年是否仍能实现这些目标?如果政府在1930年代由于农民缺乏与购买者公平协商价格的市场力量而强制执行这种合作定价制度,这种市场力量失衡是否仍然存在?价格收益归结为两个问题。第一,我们仍然认为消费者对液态奶产品的需求是乳业需求中最缺乏弹性的吗?第二,对I类产品的需求是否足够大以产生明显的收益?换句话说,我们是否在推动正确的杠杆,是否有足够的动力来证明这一努力?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号