首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >Community hoarding task forces: A comparative case study of five task forces in the United States
【24h】

Community hoarding task forces: A comparative case study of five task forces in the United States

机译:社区ho积工作队:美国五个工作队的比较案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

During the past decade, many community task forces have formed to address hoarding problems that come to public attention. Such task forces provide a societal-level intervention to assist people with the most severe cases of hoarding, who do not voluntarily seek or want help for their hoarding behaviour. This qualitative study of five U.S. hoarding task forces included sites selected for their diversity of purpose, approaches to hoarding intervention and community geography, composition and resources. Data were collected during the period of September 2007-March 2008. The case study methodology used multiple forms of data, including semi-structured interviews, analysis of documents, small group interviews and investigator observation. This study captured the perspectives of public and private sector service providers such as mental health, housing, social service, public health agencies and community enforcement organisations (fire, police, legal, animal control) to examine how task forces organise and operate and the emerging practice and policy changes. Study findings suggest that structural factors (e.g. leadership, purpose, funding and membership) impact hoarding task force viability, that participation on a task force influences practice and policy decisions about hoarding, and that social work can expand its role in task force leadership. Task forces may be a mechanism for improving community policies about hoarding and mechanisms for addressing other social problems across multiple sectors.
机译:在过去的十年中,已经成立了许多社区工作队,以解决公众关注的ho积问题。这样的工作队提供社会一级的干预,以协助那些患有最严重的ho积案件的人,这些人没有自愿为其or积行为寻求或寻求帮助。对五个美国ho积工作队的定性研究包括根据目的不同,selected积干预方法和社区地理,组成和资源选择的地点。在2007年9月至2008年3月期间收集了数据。案例研究方法使用了多种形式的数据,包括半结构化访谈,文档分析,小组访谈和调查员观察。这项研究收集了公共和私营部门服务提供者的观点,例如精神卫生,住房,社会服务,公共卫生机构和社区执法组织(消防,警察,法律,动物控制),以研究工作队的组织和运作方式以及新出现的情况。实践和政策变化。研究结果表明,结构性因素(例如领导力,目的,资金和成员资格)影响ho积工作队的生存能力,参加工作队会影响about积工作的实践和政策决策,社会工作可以扩大其在工作队领导中的作用。工作队可能是改善社区关于ho积政策的机制,也是解决跨多个部门的其他社会问题的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号