首页> 外文期刊>Hemodialysis international >Implantable cardioverter defibrillator in maintenance hemodialysis patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a single-center experience.
【24h】

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator in maintenance hemodialysis patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a single-center experience.

机译:维持性血液透析患者室性快速性心律失常的植入式心脏复律除颤器:单中心经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Patients with hemodialysis (HD) are at risk of death due to cardiac arrhythmias, worsening congestive heart failure (CHF), and noncardiac causes. This study reviews our experience with the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with ventricular tachycardia who are under maintenance HD. We retrospectively reviewed 71 consecutive patients who underwent an ICD implantation in our hospital. There were 11 patients under maintenance HD and 60 patients without HD. The group of patients with HD (HD group) was compared with the patients without HD (control group). The mean follow-up period was 30+/-9 vs. 39+/-4 months in the HD group vs. the control group, respectively. Among these patients, 6 in the HD group and 26 in the control group received appropriate ICD therapies. There was no difference in appropriate ICD therapy, time to the first therapy, and electrical storm between the 2 groups. In the HD group, 1 patient underwent surgical removal of the ICD system due to infective endocarditis. There were 5 deaths in the HD group (4 from CHF) and 8 deaths in the control group (4 from CHF). There were no sudden cardiac deaths or arrhythmic deaths in both groups of patients during the follow-up period. However, the overall death rate was significantly higher in the HD group (P<0.01). In HD patients, ICD therapy prevented arrhythmic death, but their rate of nonarrhythmic adverse outcomes was high. This risk-benefit association should be considered before implantation of the device.
机译:患有血液透析(HD)的患者有因心律不齐,充血性心力衰竭(CHF)恶化和非心脏原因导致死亡的风险。这项研究回顾了我们在维持HD​​的室性心动过速患者中使用植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的经验。我们回顾性回顾了71例在我院接受ICD植入的连续患者。维持高清的患者11例,无高清的患者60例。将HD患者组(HD组)与非HD患者组(对照组)进行比较。 HD组和对照组的平均随访时间分别为30 +/- 9个月和39 +/- 4个月。在这些患者中,HD组6例,对照组26例接受了适当的ICD治疗。两组之间适当的ICD治疗,首次治疗时间和电击没有差异。在HD组中,由于感染性心内膜炎,有1例患者接受了ICD系统的手术切除。 HD组有5例死亡(4例来自CHF),对照组有8例死亡(4例来自CHF)。在随访期间,两组患者均无心源性猝死或心律失常性死亡。然而,HD组的总死亡率显着更高(P <0.01)。在HD患者中,ICD治疗可防止心律失常性死亡,但他们的非心律失常不良结局发生率很高。在植入设备之前,应考虑这种风险与收益的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号