首页> 外文期刊>Health policy >Factors that led to the implementation of the efficiency frontier approach in health economic evaluation in Germany: Do not avoid the elephant in the room: Comment on Klingler et al. (Health policy 109 (2013) 270-280)
【24h】

Factors that led to the implementation of the efficiency frontier approach in health economic evaluation in Germany: Do not avoid the elephant in the room: Comment on Klingler et al. (Health policy 109 (2013) 270-280)

机译:导致在德国卫生经济评估中采用效率前沿方法的因素:不要躲开房间里的大象:对Klingler等人的评论。 (卫生政策109(2013)270-280)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Klingier et al. claim that the following factors led to the adoption of the efficiency frontier (EF) approach in Germany: the rejection of a fixed threshold, focusing on clinical benefit instead of cost-effectiveness as decision parameter, (avoiding) healthcare rationing, methodological doubts regarding quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and associating QALYs with healthcare rationing [1 ]. In our opinion, the authors may overlook the factual aim of the EF-approach: justification of setting ceiling prices instead of making reimbursement decisions. Furthermore, the role of a judicial review - a crucial veto point in the German regulatory space - has not been discussed. Both will briefly be explained below.
机译:Klingier等。声称以下因素导致在德国采用效率前沿(EF)方法:拒绝固定阈值,将重点放在临床收益而不是成本效益上作为决策参数,(避免)医疗保健配给,对质量的方法学怀疑调整生命年(QALYs),并将QALYs与医疗保健配给关联[1]。我们认为,作者可能忽略了EF方法的实际目标:设定最高价格的理由而不是做出补偿决定。此外,尚未讨论司法审查的作用-在德国监管领域中至关重要的否决点-。两者将在下面简要说明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号