...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy >Too little, too late: comparison of nutritional status and quality of life of nutrition care and support recipient and non-recipients among HIV-positive adults in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
【24h】

Too little, too late: comparison of nutritional status and quality of life of nutrition care and support recipient and non-recipients among HIV-positive adults in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

机译:太少了,太晚了:南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省艾滋病毒呈阳性成年人中营养状况和营养保健以及支持者和非接受者的生活质量的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Compare the nutritional vulnerability, risk of malnutrition, nutritional status and quality of life (QoL) between recipients and non-recipients of nutrition care and support (NCS) of HIV-positive adults. METHODS: In 2009, a household-based cross-sectional study of HIV-positive adults, NCS recipients (n=97) and non-NCS recipients (n=203) from KwaZulu-Natal was conducted. Nutritional vulnerability (socio-economic status; food security; self-reported health status; nutritional knowledge and attitude), risk of malnutrition (nutrition assessment screening tool), anthropometry (body mass index; mid-upper arm circumference; waist-to-hip ratio) and QoL (general health; self-care; physical functioning) were compared between the two groups. RESULT: Although the result suggests a modest impairment of QoL, NCS recipients were twice as likely to have severe impairment of general health; self-care functioning and QoL. Overweight and obesity were common despite indications of high prevalence of food insecurity, possible-risk of malnutrition and diets predominantly of cereals. NCS recipients were more frequently taking anti-retroviral drugs, receiving social grants, reporting good eating plans and owning kitchen gardens. Non-NCS recipients had been generally sick, reported fatigue, nausea, appetite loss and diarrhoea. NCS recipients were twice as likely to experience oral thrush. CONCLUSION: Contextual factors such as low dietary diversity and household food insecurity that exacerbates nutritional vulnerability and malnutrition should be considered when providing NCS to fully achieve nutritional recovery and QoL of HIV-positive adults.
机译:目的:比较艾滋病毒呈阳性成年人的接受者和非接受者的营养脆弱性,营养不良风险,营养状况和生活质量(QoL)。方法:2009年,对夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的HIV阳性成年人,NCS接受者(n = 97)和非NCS接受者(n = 203)进行了基于家庭的横断面研究。营养脆弱性(社会经济状况;粮食安全;自我报告的健康状况;营养知识和态度),营养不良风险(营养评估筛查工具),人体测量法(体重指数;上臂中段;腰部至臀部)两组之间的比率)和生活质量(总体健康,自我保健,身体机能)进行了比较。结果:尽管结果表明适度的QoL损害,但NCS接受者严重损害一般健康的可能性是后者的两倍。自我保健功能和生活质量。尽管有迹象表明食物不安全的高发,营养不良的可能风险以及主要是谷物的饮食,超重和肥胖仍然很常见。 NCS接受者更经常服用抗逆转录病毒药物,获得社会补助,报告良好的饮食计划并拥有厨房花园。非NCS接受者通常已患病,报告有疲劳,恶心,食欲不振和腹泻。 NCS接受者患鹅口疮的可能性是其两倍。结论:当提供NCS以充分实现HIV阳性成年人的营养恢复和QoL时,应考虑到诸如饮食多样性低和家庭粮食不安全之类的背景因素,这加剧了营养脆弱性和营养不良。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号