首页> 外文期刊>Health policy >Compulsory private complementary health insurance offered by employers in France: Implications and current debate
【24h】

Compulsory private complementary health insurance offered by employers in France: Implications and current debate

机译:法国雇主提供的强制性私人补充健康保险:含义和当前争论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In January 2013, within the framework of a National Inter-professional Agreement (NIA), the French government required all employers (irrespective of the size of their business) to offer private complementary health insurance to their employees from January 2016. The generalization of group complementary health insurance to all employees will directly affect insurers, employers and employees, as well as individuals not directly concerned (students, retirees, unemployed and civil servants). In this paper, we present the issues raised by this regulation, the expected consequences and the current debate around this reform. In particular, we argue that this reform may have adverse effects on equity of access to complementary health insurance in France, since the risk structure of the market for individual health insurance will change, potentially increasing inequalities between wage earners and others. Moreover, tax exemptions given to group contracts are problematic because public funds used to support these contracts can be higher at individual level for high-salary individuals than those allocated to improve access for the poorest. In response to the criticism and with the aim of ensuring equity in the system, the government decided to reconsider some of the fiscal advantages given to group contracts, to enhance programs and aids dedicated to the poorest and to redefine an overall context of incentives. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
机译:2013年1月,法国政府在《国家跨行业协议》(NIA)的框架内,要求所有雇主(无论业务规模如何)自2016年1月起向其员工提供私人补充健康保险。对所有雇员的补充健康保险将直接影响保险公司,雇主和雇员以及与个人没有直接关系的个人(学生,退休人员,失业人员和公务员)。在本文中,我们介绍了该法规提出的问题,预期的后果以及围绕该改革的当前辩论。特别是,我们认为,这种改革可能会对法国补充性健康保险的公平性产生不利影响,因为个人健康保险市场的风险结构将发生变化,从而可能加剧工薪阶层与其他人之间的不平等。此外,给予集体合同的免税问题是有问题的,因为用于支持这些合同的公共资金在个人层面上对于高薪个人而言可能高于为改善最贫困人口的分配而分配的公共资金。为了应对批评,并为了确保体系中的公平性,政府决定重新考虑给予集体合同的一些财政优势,加强针对最贫困人群的计划和援助,并重新定义激励措施的总体背景。 (C)2015由爱思唯尔爱尔兰有限公司出版。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号