...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy >Academic Collaborative Centre Limburg: A platform for knowledge transfer and exchange in public health policy, research and practice?
【24h】

Academic Collaborative Centre Limburg: A platform for knowledge transfer and exchange in public health policy, research and practice?

机译:林堡学术合作中心:公共卫生政策,研究和实践中知识转移和交流的平台吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Research findings often fail to find their way into policy and practice, which is assumed to limit the effectiveness of public health policies and programmes. We evaluated to what extent the Academic Collaborative Centre Limburg (ACCL), a Dutch boundary organization linking policy, research and practice, has improved knowledge transfer and exchange between the three domains. We used a mixed-methods approach. First, stakeholders jointly defined the ACCL's programme theory, showing how the ACCL was supposed to achieve its intended effects. Second, we assessed the achievements of the ACCL in terms of knowledge transfer and exchange on the basis of the programme theory. The ACCL was found to provide a platform for interaction between actors from the policy, research and practice domains, facilitated by integrated network structures. The number of collaborative projects and actors involved in the ACCL increased, but actual cross-domain interaction patterns did not really change. Cross-domain knowledge transfer and exchange still require major boundary-spanning efforts by the ACCL programme leader. Boundary organizations do not automatically produce cross-domain interactions. In addition to infrastructural arrangements, cross-domain knowledge transfer and exchange could benefit from additional cultural changes, like adopting a deliberative approach to policy making and applying constructivist research designs.
机译:研究结果往往无法进入政策和实践,这被认为限制了公共卫生政策和计划的有效性。我们评估了林堡学术合作中心(ACCL),这是一个将政策,研究与实践联系起来的荷兰边界组织,在多大程度上改善了这三个领域之间的知识转移和交流。我们使用了混合方法。首先,利益相关者共同定义了ACCL的计划理论,展示了ACCL应该如何实现其预期的效果。其次,我们根据程序理论评估了ACCL在知识转移和交流方面的成就。发现ACCL通过集成的网络结构为政策,研究和实践领域的参与者之间的交互提供了一个平台。 ACCL中参与的协作项目和参与者的数量有所增加,但是实际的跨域交互模式并没有真正改变。跨领域的知识转移和交流仍然需要ACCL计划负责人进行跨领域的重大努力。边界组织不会自动产生跨域交互。除基础设施安排外,跨域知识的转移和交流还可以从其他文化变革中受益,例如采用协商性政策制定方法和应用建构主义研究设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号