首页> 外文期刊>Harvard international law journal >Secrecy, Monopoly, and Access to Pharmaceuticals in International Trade Law: Protection of Marketing Approval Data Under the TRIPs Agreement
【24h】

Secrecy, Monopoly, and Access to Pharmaceuticals in International Trade Law: Protection of Marketing Approval Data Under the TRIPs Agreement

机译:国际贸易法中的保密,垄断和药品获取:根据TRIPs协议保护营销批准数据

获取原文
       

摘要

Among the many trade conflicts that divide the postindustrial economies of Europe, the United States, Japan, and the Commonwealth from the less information-driven economies of the rest of the world, one of the most consequential is the debate over how to balance access to medicines with the intellectual property protection demanded by their developers. Among the many facets of this debate is the question of whether pharmaceuticals, vaccines, biologies, and other therapeutic or preventative health consumables (to which this article will refer collectively as "drugs") should be patentable in developing countries. This debate was partly resolved by the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs Agreement), which allows signatories to exclude from patentability "diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical methods for the treatment of humans or animals" yet requires the patenting of pharmaceuticals after a transition period. Nonetheless, disagreement about access to medicines has plagued subsequent negotiations. The economically developed states, led by the United States, have demanded that WTO members cease liberal compulsory licensing practices and adopt patent protection regimes equivalent in most significant respects to those of the United States and Europe.
机译:在将欧洲,美国,日本和英联邦的后工业经济与世界其他地区较少信息驱动的经济区分开的众多贸易冲突中,最重要的问题之一是关于如何平衡获取具有开发人员要求的知识产权保护的药品。在这场辩论的许多方面中,一个问题是药品,疫苗,生物制剂以及其他治疗性或预防性健康消费品(本文统称为“药物”)是否应在发展中国家获得专利。世界贸易组织(世贸组织)《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》(TRIPs协定)部分解决了这一辩论,该协定允许签署国将“用于治疗人类或动物的诊断,治疗和手术方法”从专利权中排除。过渡期后仍需要对药品进行专利申请。尽管如此,关于药物获取的分歧困扰了随后的谈判。在美国的领导下,经济发达的国家要求世贸组织成员停止自由的强制许可做法,并采取在最重要的方面与美国和欧洲相当的专利保护制度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号