首页> 外文期刊>Hepato-gastroenterology. >Management of Traumatic Splenic Rupture in Adults: A Single Center's Experience in Mainland China
【24h】

Management of Traumatic Splenic Rupture in Adults: A Single Center's Experience in Mainland China

机译:成人创伤性脾破裂的管理:单中心在中国大陆的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Aims: We evaluated the effectiveness of various therapies to treat the traumatic splenic rupture by using data from our single center. Methodology: From July 2008 to Jan 2014, 125 patients who were diagnosis spleen rupture without other organ injury were included into our present study. We divided these patients into two groups according to the managements of the splenic rupture: the operative management (OM) group (48 patients) and the non-operative management (NOM) group (77 patients). We compared the baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes of two groups. The OM group was divided into three sub-groups according to the different operative methods: the total splenectomy group, partial splenectomy group and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) group. Results: Splenic injuries were most commonly observed in abdominal trauma: traffic accidents (49 cases), fall from height (36 cases), strike (22 cases), assaults (11 cases), and sports (7 cases). Of the patients included in our study, 48 patients accepted OM, and 77 patients accepted NOM. The baseline characteristics, including age, gender, BMI, and underlying diseases, were comparable between the two groups. However, the OM group patients exhibited more severe splenic rupture according to the AAST grade (P=0.000). The three subgroups in the OM group (total splenectomies group (26 cases), partial splenectomy (12 patients), RFA-assisted spleen-preserving surgery (10 patients) exhibited no significant differences with respect to intraoperative data or postoperative recovery. The length of hospital stay in the NOM group was significantly longer than that in the OM group (6.8±1.4 VS 3.4±0.8, P=0.000), but the OM and NOM patients reported comparable quality of life according to the SF-36 scale. Conclusion: In conclusion, the outcomes of operative management for splenic rupture were comparable, and the OM and the NOM patients exhibited a similar quality of life after splenic rupture, although longer hospital stays were observed in the NOM group.
机译:背景/目的:我们通过使用来自单一中心的数据,评估了各种治疗脾脏破裂的方法的有效性。方法:2008年7月至2014年1月,本研究纳入了125例经诊断为脾破裂而无其他器官损伤的患者。根据脾破裂的治疗方法,将这些患者分为两组:手术治疗(OM)组(48例)和非手术治疗(NOM)组(77例)。我们比较了两组的基线特征和长期结果。根据不同的手术方法,将OM组分为三个亚组:全脾切除组,部分脾切除组和射频消融(RFA)组。结果:脾脏损伤最常见于腹部创伤:交通事故(49例),高处摔倒(36例),罢工(22例),殴打(11例)和运动(7例)。在我们研究的患者中,48例接受OM,77例接受NOM。两组的基线特征,包括年龄,性别,BMI和基础疾病,具有可比性。然而,根据AAST等级,OM组患者表现出更严重的脾破裂(P = 0.000)。 OM组的三个亚组(总脾切除组(26例),部分脾切除术(12例),RFA辅助脾保留手术(10例)在术中数据或术后恢复方面无显着差异。 NOM组的住院时间明显长于OM组(6.8±1.4 VS 3.4±0.8,P = 0.000),但根据SF-36量表,OM和NOM患者的生活质量相当。总之,脾破裂的手术治疗结果是可比的,尽管在NOM组观察到更长的住院时间,但OM和NOM患者在脾破裂后表现出相似的生活质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号