...
首页> 外文期刊>Health technology assessment: HTA >Antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies in primary care: a cohort study and cluster randomised trial to inform a simulation model. The Screening for Haemoglobinopathies in First Trimester (SHIFT) trial.
【24h】

Antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies in primary care: a cohort study and cluster randomised trial to inform a simulation model. The Screening for Haemoglobinopathies in First Trimester (SHIFT) trial.

机译:初级保健中血红蛋白病的产前筛查:一项队列研究和整群随机试验,为模拟模型提供信息。孕早期血红蛋白病筛查(SHIFT)试验。

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of offering universal antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening in primary care when pregnancy is first confirmed and to model the cost-effectiveness of early screening in primary care versus standard care. DESIGN: A population-based cohort study, cluster randomised trial and refinement of a published decision model. SETTING: Twenty-five general practices from two UK primary care trusts (PCTs) in two inner city boroughs with a high proportion of residents from minority ethnic groups. PARTICIPANTS: Practices were considered eligible if they agreed to be randomised and they were able to provide anonymous data on all eligible pregnant women. Participants were at least 18 years old and consented to take part in the evaluation. INTERVENTIONS: Practices were allocated to intervention, using minimisation and stratifying for PCT and number of partners at the practice, as follows: screening in primary care with parallel father testing (test offered to mother and father simultaneously; n = 8 clusters, 1010 participants); screening in primary care with sequential father testing (test offered to father only if mother identified as carrier; n = 9 clusters, 792 participants); and screening in secondary care with sequential father testing (standard care; n = 8 clusters, 619 participants). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on gestational age at pregnancy confirmation and screening date were collected from trial practices for 6 months before randomisation in the cohort phase. The primary outcome measure was timing of SCT screening, measured as the proportion of women screened before 70 days' (10 weeks') gestation. Other outcomes included: offer of screening, rates of informed choice and proportion of women who knew the carrier status of their baby's father by 77 days (11 weeks). RESULTS: For 1441 eligible women in the cohort phase, the median [interquartile range (IQR)] gestational age at pregnancy confirmation was 7.6 weeks (6.0 to 10.7 weeks) and 74% presented in primary care before 10 weeks. The median gestational age at screening was 15.3 weeks (IQR 12.6 to 18.0 weeks). Only 4.4% were screened before 10 weeks. The median delay between pregnancy confirmation and screening was 6.9 weeks (4.7 to 9.3 weeks). In the intervention phase, 1708 pregnancies from 25 practices were assessed for the primary outcome measure. Completed questionnaires were obtained from 464 women who met eligibility criteria for the main analysis. The proportion of women screened by 10 weeks (70 days) was 9/441 (2%) in standard care, compared with 161/677 (24%) in primary care with parallel testing, and 167/590 (28%) in primary care with sequential testing. The proportion of women offered screening by 10 weeks (70 days) was 3/90 (3%) in standard care (note offer of test ascertained for questionnaire respondents only), compared with 321/677 (47%) in primary care with parallel testing, and 281/590 (48%) in primary care with sequential testing. The proportion of women screened by 26 weeks (182 days) was similar across the three groups: 324/441 (73%) in standard care, 571/677 (84%, 0.09) in primary care with parallel testing, and 481/590 (82%, 0.148) in primary care with sequential testing. The screening uptake of fathers was 51/677 (8%) in primary care with parallel testing, and 16/590 (3%) in primary care with sequential testing, and 13/441 (3%) in standard care. The predicted average total cost per pregnancy of offering antenatal SCT screening was estimated to be 13 pounds in standard care, 18.50 pounds in primary care with parallel testing, and 16.40 pounds in primary care with sequential testing. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 23 pounds in primary care with parallel testing and 12 pounds in primary care with sequential testing when compared with standard care. Women offered testing in primary care were as likely to make an informed choice as those offere
机译:目的:评估初次确诊妊娠时在初级保健中进行普遍的产前镰状细胞和地中海贫血(SCT)筛查的有效性,成本效益,可接受性和可行性,并模拟初级保健与标准保健中早期筛查的成本-效果。设计:基于人群的队列研究,聚类随机试验和完善已发布的决策模型。地点:两个内城区的两个英国初级保健基金会(PCTs)进行的25种常规操作,这些居民中的少数民族比例很高。参与者:如果实践同意将其随机化并且能够提供所有符合条件的孕妇的匿名数据,则认为它们是合格的。参加者至少年满18岁,并同意参加评估。干预措施:将实践分配给干预措施,使用最小化和分层的PCT以及实践中的合作伙伴数量,具体如下:通过平行父亲测试对初级保健进行筛查(同时提供给父亲和父亲的测试; n = 8组,1010名参与者) ;通过顺序父亲测试对初级保健进行筛查(仅在母亲被确定为携带者的情况下才提供给父亲; n = 9个类,792位参与者);并通过顺序父亲测试对二级保健进行筛查(标准保健; n = 8组,619名参与者)。主要观察指标:在队列阶段随机化之前的6个月中,从试验实践中收集了妊娠确诊和筛查日期的胎龄数据。主要结局指标是SCT筛查的时机,以怀孕70天(10周)之前筛查的妇女比例来衡量。其他结果包括:提供筛查,知情选择的比率以及在77天(11周)之前知道婴儿父亲的携带者状况的妇女比例。结果:对于队列研究中的1441名合格妇女,在确认怀孕时的中位[四分位间距(IQR)]胎龄为7.6周(6.0至10.7周),其中74%的患者在10周前接受了初级保健。筛查的平均胎龄为15.3周(IQR 12.6至18.0周)。在10周前仅筛查了4.4%。妊娠确认和筛查之间的中位延迟时间为6.9周(4.7至9.3周)。在干预阶段,评估了来自25种实践的1708例妊娠,作为主要结局指标。从符合主要分析入选标准的464名妇女中获得完整的调查表。在标准护理中,经过10周(70天)筛查的女性比例为9/441(2%),而在平行检查的基础护理中为161/677(24%),在初级护理中为167/590(28%)注意顺序测试。在标准护理中(在10周(70天)内接受筛查的女性比例为3/90(3%)(注:仅针对问卷调查对象确定的测试要约),而在初级保健中,平行护理的女性比例为321/677(47%)测试和281/590(48%)的初级保健中进行顺序测试。在三组中,经过26周(182天)筛查的女性比例相似:在标准护理中为324/441(73%),在平行检查中为初级护理中为571/677(84%,0.09),以及481/590 (82%,0.148)在初级保健中进行了顺序测试。在平行检查的基础保健中,父亲的筛查摄取率为51/677(8%),在连续检查的基础保健中为16/590(3%),在标准保健中为13/441(3%)。进行产前SCT筛查的每次怀孕的预计平均总费用估计为:标准护理为13磅,平行检测为18.50磅,序贯检测为16.40磅。与标准护理相比,采用平行检验的初级保健的增量成本效益比(ICER)为23磅,采用顺序检验的增量成本效益比(ICER)为12磅。提供初级保健检测的妇女与接受报价的妇女做出知情选择的可能性相同

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号