...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemotherapy: International Journal of Experimental and Clinical Chemotherapy >Sequential administration of 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV) followed by irinotecan (CPT-11) at relapse versus CPT-11 followed by 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal carcinoma. A phase III randomized study.
【24h】

Sequential administration of 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV) followed by irinotecan (CPT-11) at relapse versus CPT-11 followed by 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal carcinoma. A phase III randomized study.

机译:在晚期结直肠癌中,在复发时顺序给予5-氟尿嘧啶(5FU)/亚叶酸钙(LV),然后给予伊立替康(CPT-11),而与CPT-11依次给予5-FU / LV。 III期随机研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the differences in the sequence of administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) followed by irinotecan (CPT-11), or CPT-11 followed by 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with ACC were allocated to the following treatment groups: group A, a bolus of 20 mg/m(2) LV and 425 mg/m(2) 5-FU for 5 days until progression/relapse, and upon progression treatment with weekly CPT-11 (100 mg/m(2)), and group B, CPT-11 followed at progression/relapse by 5-FU/LV at the same doses and schedules as in group A. RESULTS: 120 patients were randomized to receive one of the two treatment sequences and their pretreatment characteristics were equally balanced between treatment arms. No statistically significant difference was found in the objective response rate to CPT-11 (p = 0.45); partial response (PR) was 23.3% for group A patients and 33.3% for group B. Following documented progression and secondline treatment there was a significant difference between the response rate in group A (23.3%) and group B where no patients were found to respond to second-line treatment with 5-FU/LV (p = 0.024). The median overall survival was 42.0 weeks (range, 36.6-47.4 weeks) for group A and 32.0 weeks (range, 28.2-35.8 weeks) for group B. The median time to progression for patients in group A following first-line 5-FU/LV was 18 weeks (range, 10-36 weeks) and 12 weeks (range, 10-16 weeks) for group B following first-line CPT-11 (p = 0.0005). Toxicity, according to WHO, was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treating patients with CPT-11 upon progression to 5-FU/LV treatment seems to be superior to the opposite sequence. We used these treatments as sequential monotherapies (at progression/relapse), and the best results are gained when 5-FU/LV is followed by CPT-11 at disease progression or relapse.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)/亚叶酸钙(LV)继以伊立替康(CPT-11)或CPT-11继以5-FU的给药顺序的差异/ LV治疗晚期大肠癌(ACC)。患者和方法:初治ACC的患者被分为以下治疗组:A组,20 mg / m(2)LV和425 mg / m(2)5-FU推注5天,直至进展/复发,以及每周进行CPT-11(100 mg / m(2))和B组的进展治疗后,CPT-11随后以5-FU / LV进行进展/复发,剂量和时间表与A组相同。 :120位患者被随机分配接受两种治疗顺序之一,并且其治疗前特征在各治疗组之间均等平衡。对CPT-11的客观应答率无统计学差异(p = 0.45); A组患者的部分缓解(PR)为23.3%,B组为33.3%。在记录了进展和二线治疗后,A组(23.3%)和B组的缓解率之间存在显着差异,未发现患者对5-FU / LV的二线治疗有反应(p = 0.024)。 A组的中位总生存时间为42.0周(范围36.6-47.4周),B组的中位总生存时间为32.0周(范围28.2-35.8周)。一线5-FU后A组患者的中位进展时间一线CPT-11后,B组的/ LV为18周(范围10-36周)和12周(范围10-16周)(p = 0.0005)。据世界卫生组织称,各组之间的毒性相似。结论:在进展为5-FU / LV治疗后用CPT-11治疗患者似乎优于相反的顺序。我们将这些治疗方法用作顺序的单一疗法(在进展/复发时),并且在疾病进展或复发时,在5-FU / LV后接CPT-11可获得最佳结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号