首页> 外文期刊>Health sociology review: the journal of the Health Section of the Australian Sociological Association >Managerialism and medical charity: How employing and pre-paying doctors affects the provision of free care in the United States
【24h】

Managerialism and medical charity: How employing and pre-paying doctors affects the provision of free care in the United States

机译:管理主义和医疗慈善:雇用和预付费医生如何影响美国的免费医疗服务

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Since the mid-nineteenth century, the American Medical Association's code of ethics has mandated that physicians provide charity care. However managerialism has threatened the likelihood of physicians' providing charity care. Specifically, physicians who recently became employees, or whose revenue became predominantly pre-paid, also became less likely to provide free care. Moreover, physicians with an increased proportion of revenue from Medicaid, or in counties with high Medicaid managed care penetration, were less likely to provide charity, perhaps due in part to a reduced ability to cost-shift. Despite upcoming health reform, managerial strategies that employ or pre-pay physicians are likely to leave many millions of uninsured without access to charity care from physicians.
机译:自19世纪中叶以来,美国医学会的道德规范已要求医生提供慈善护理。然而,管理主义威胁了医生提供慈善护理的可能性。具体来说,最近成为雇员的医生或收入主要为预付的医生,也不太可能提供免费护理。此外,医生从医疗补助计划中获得的收入比例增加,或者在医疗补助计划管理的医疗渗透率较高的县,提供慈善服务的可能性较小,这可能部分是由于降低了成本转移能力。尽管即将进行医疗改革,但雇用或预付医师费用的管理策略很可能使数百万没有保险的患者无法获得医师的慈善护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号