...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart, lung & circulation >Early discharge after percutaneous intervention - we can but should we?
【24h】

Early discharge after percutaneous intervention - we can but should we?

机译:经皮介入治疗后提早出院-我们可以但应该这样做吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In developed nations such as Australia and New Zealand, which have comprehensive public health insurance systems, there is an ever-present tension between the desire to provide optimal health care and the cost of doing so. Thus we continually search for more efficient ways to deliver health care. Intervention cardiology incurs significant public cost and hence the attraction of innovations, which can limit that cost.The proposal that we can discharge patients on the same day after percutaneous intervention (PCI) is one such innovation, but is it one that we should adopt? The report by Dr Herman in this issue of the Journal supports this initiative [1]. Their conclusions are similar to those of a number of previous international reports [2,3]. Another randomised trial of early discharge after elective PCI, involving 800 patients found no difference in 24 hour mortality or major adverse events between those randomised to early discharge and those randomised to overnight stay [4].
机译:在澳大利亚和新西兰等拥有完善的公共健康保险体系的发达国家中,提供最佳医疗保健的愿望与这样做的成本之间始终存在着紧张关系。因此,我们一直在寻找更有效的方式来提供医疗保健。介入心脏病学会招致巨大的公共成本,并因此而吸引创新,从而限制了成本。关于在经皮介入治疗(PCI)后当天就可以出院的建议就是其中一项创新,但我们应该采用吗? Herman博士在本期《华尔街日报》上的报告支持了这一倡议[1]。他们的结论与许多先前的国际报告的结论相似[2,3]。另一项关于选择性PCI后早期出院的随机试验,涉及800名患者,发现随机分配到早期出院的患者和随机分配到过夜的患者在24小时死亡率或重大不良事件方面没有差异[4]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号