首页> 外文期刊>Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society >Response to the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services coverage with evidence development request for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Data from the OMNI study
【24h】

Response to the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services coverage with evidence development request for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Data from the OMNI study

机译:回应医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的覆盖,并提供针对一级预防植入式心脏复律除颤器的证据开发要求:来自OMNI研究的数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services expanded coverage for primary prevention (PP) implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) included a request for outcome comparisons between 3 Group B subgroup patients (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 31%-35%, nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy [NDCM] duration of <9 months, and New York Heart Association class IV heart failure (HF) treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy/defibrillator [CRT/D]) and non-Group B patients (LVEF ≤30%, NDCM duration of <9 months, and New York Heart Association class III HF treated with CRT/D) using real-world observational studies. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services Group B and non-Group B PP ICD patients. METHODS: OMNI was a 4-year prospective observational study that enrolled 1464 PP ICD patients with a mean LVEF of 25%; 72% were men, 78% had class II-IV HF, and 66% had coronary disease. A total of 795 (54.3%) received ICDs, and 669 (45.7%) received CRT/Ds. Ventricular tachyarrhythmia therapy rates and mortality were compared over 39 ± 18.4 months. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent received ventricular tachyarrhythmia therapies, and 21.2% died within 4 years. Patient-year therapy rates were not significantly different for LVEF of 31%-35% (0.36 per year) vs ≤30% (0.51/y) and CRT/D for class IV HF (0.21/y) vs class III HF (0.43 per year) but were lower for NDCM <9 months (0.3/y) vs <9 months (0.85/y; P = .02). Four-year mortality was similar for LVEF 30%-35% (22.6%) vs <30% (24.4%) and NDCM <9 months (14.2%) vs <9 months (12.3%) but was higher for CRT/D for class IV HF (48.6%) vs class III HF (27.4%) (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Patient-year ventricular tachyarrhythmia therapy rates did not differ between non-Group B and Group B PP ICD patients, though NDCM <9 months was significantly lower. Survival at 4 years was lowest in patients with New York Heart Association class IV HF treated with CRT/D and similar between all other non-Group B and Group B patients.
机译:背景:医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心扩大了对一级预防(PP)植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的覆盖范围,其中包括对3个B组亚组患者(左心室射血分数[LVEF] 31%-35%,非缺血性扩张型心肌病[NDCM]持续时间<9个月,以及使用心脏再同步治疗/除颤器[CRT / D]治疗的纽约心脏协会IV级心力衰竭(HF))和非B组患者(LVEF≤30%,NDCM持续时间少于9个月,并且使用现实世界的观察性研究对纽约心脏协会的CRT / D级HF类进行了治疗)。目的:比较医疗保险和医疗补助中心B组和非B组PP ICD患者的结局。方法:OMNI是一项为期4年的前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了1464名PP ICD患者,平均LVEF为25%。男性为72%,II-IV级HF为78%,冠心病为66%。共有795个(54.3%)收到了ICD,有669个(45.7%)收到了CRT / D。在39±18.4个月内比较了室性心律失常的治疗率和死亡率。结果:25%的患者接受了室速性心律失常的治疗,21.2%的患者在4年内死亡。 LVEF为31%-35%(每年0.36)vs≤30%(0.51 / y)和CRT / D的IV类HF(0.21 / y)与III类HF(0.43)的患者年治疗率无显着差异每年),但NDCM <9个月(0.3 / y)低于<9个月(0.85 / y; P = .02)。 LVEF 30%-35%(22.6%)vs <30%(24.4%)和NDCM <9个月(14.2%)vs <9个月(12.3%)的四年死亡率相似,但CRT / D高于IV级HF(48.6%)与III级HF(27.4%)(P = 0.01)。结论:非B组和B组PP ICD患者的患者年室速心律失常治疗率无差异,尽管NDCM <9个月明显降低。使用CRT / D治疗的纽约心脏协会IV级HF患者的4年生存率最低,其他所有非B组患者与B组患者相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号