...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart failure reviews >Clinical relevance of biomarkers in heart failure and cardiorenal syndrome: The role of Natriuretic peptides and troponin
【24h】

Clinical relevance of biomarkers in heart failure and cardiorenal syndrome: The role of Natriuretic peptides and troponin

机译:生物标志物在心力衰竭和心肾综合征中的临床意义:利钠肽和肌钙蛋白的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years, numerous biomarkers have been studied in heart failure to improve diagnostic accuracy and identify patients at higher risk. The overall outcome remains fairish despite improvements in therapy, with mean survival after first hospitalization, around 5 years. We therefore need surrogate end points to better understand the pathogenetic mechanisms of the disease, including interplays with other organs. The kidney plays an important role in the initiation and progression of HF, and around one-third of patients with HF show some degree of renal dysfunction. In addition, treatment for HF often worsens renal function, consequently to hemodynamic and clinical improvement do not correspond an effective improvement in HF prognosis. Association between HF and renal impairment (RI) is now classified as cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) pointing out the bidirectional nature of this vicious circle leading to a mutual and progressive damage of both organs. The clinicians can rely on circulating biomarkers that give insights into the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms and help in risk stratification. Recently, a multimarker strategy including biomarker tool to traditional risk scores has been purposed and applied: Although each biomarker provided incremental outcome benefit, the combination of multiple biomarkers should offer the greatest improvement in risk prediction. Natriuretic peptides (NP) and cardiac troponins (TN) are the two biomarkers most studied in this setting, probably because of their organ-specific nature. However, both NP and TN cutoffs in presence of renal dysfunction need to be revised and discussed in relation to age, gender and stage of RI. In this context, the biomarkers are a unique opportunity to elucidate pathophysiological mechanisms, tailor clinical management to the single patient and improve outcomes. Specific studies about the exact role of biomarkers as in HF as in CRS should be planned and considered for future trials.
机译:近年来,在心力衰竭中研究了许多生物标志物,以提高诊断准确性并确定高危患者。尽管治疗方法有所改善,但总体结果仍然尚可,首次住院后平均生存期约为5年。因此,我们需要替代终点以更好地了解该疾病的致病机制,包括与其他器官的相互作用。肾脏在心力衰竭的发生和发展中起着重要作用,大约三分之一的心力衰竭患者表现出一定程度的肾功能不全。另外,对HF的治疗常常使肾功能恶化,因此血液动力学和临床改善并不代表HF预后的有效改善。 HF和肾功能不全(RI)之间的关联现在被归类为心肾综合征(CRS),指出这种恶性循环的双向性质导致了两个器官的相互和进行性损伤。临床医生可以依靠循环生物标记物,深入了解潜在的致病机制并帮助进行风险分层。最近,已经针对和应用了包括针对传统风险评分的生物标志物工具在内的多标志物策略:尽管每种生物标志物都提供了递增的结局收益,但多种生物标志物的组合应该可以最大程度地改善风险预测。利钠肽(NP)和心肌肌钙蛋白(TN)是在这种情况下研究最多的两个生物标记,可能是由于它们的器官特异性。但是,存在肾功能不全的NP和TN截止值都需要进行修订,并应与年龄,性别和RI的阶段有关。在这种情况下,生物标记物是阐明病理生理机制,为单例患者量身定制临床管理并改善疗效的独特机会。应计划进行有关生物标志物在HF和CRS中的确切作用的具体研究,并考虑用于将来的试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号