首页> 外文期刊>Health information and libraries journal >Reporting statistical analyses in peer review journal articles
【24h】

Reporting statistical analyses in peer review journal articles

机译:在同行评审期刊文章中报告统计分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As a regular referee for the Health Information and Libraries Journal, Richard Stephens - Winner of the 2014 Wellcome Trust Science Writing Prize - has been impressed by the science on offer in the Health Information and Libraries Journal. But he has also been struck by how often similar problems with statistical analysis reporting come up during the review process. Acknowledging that statistics can be scary, he advocates that they should be simply viewed as a means of communicating ideas. In this editorial, he provides some straightforward guidelines on reporting statistical analyses in peer review journal articles, highlights pitfalls to avoid and illustrates best practice to aim for.
机译:作为《健康信息与图书馆杂志》的定期裁判,理查德·斯蒂芬斯(Richard Stephens)-2014年惠康信托科学写作奖获得者-对《健康信息与图书馆杂志》所提供的科学印象深刻。但是,他也对在审查过程中出现统计分析报告类似问题的频率感到震惊。他承认统计数据可能令人恐惧,因此主张应将其简单地视为传达思想的一种手段。在这篇社论中,他为同行评议期刊文章中的报告统计分析提供了一些简单明了的指南,强调了要避免的陷阱并说明了旨在实现的最佳实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号