...
首页> 外文期刊>Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy >A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research.
【24h】

A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research.

机译:用于分析公众参与卫生服务研究的多维概念框架。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of a multidimensional conceptual framework capable of drawing out the implications for policy and practice of what is known about public involvement in research agenda setting. BACKGROUND: Public involvement in research is growing in western and developing countries. There is a need to learn from collective experience and a diverse literature of research, policy documents and reflective reports. METHODS: Systematic searches of research literature, policy and lay networks identified reports of public involvement in research agenda setting. Framework analysis, previously described for primary research, was used to develop the framework, which was then applied to reports of public involvement in order to analyse and compare these. FINDINGS: The conceptual framework takes into account the people involved; the people initiating the involvement; the degree of public involvement; the forum for exchange; and methods used for decision making. It also considers context (in terms of the research focus and the historical, geographical or institutional setting), and theoretical basis. CONCLUSIONS: The framework facilitates learning across diverse experiences, whether reported in policy documents, reflections or formal research, to generate a policy- and practice-relevant overview. A further advantage is that it identifies gaps in the literature which need to be filled in order to inform future research about public involvement.
机译:目的:描述一个多维概念框架的发展,该框架能够阐明已知的公众参与研究议程设置对政策和实践的影响。背景:西方国家和发展中国家的公众参与研究的人数正在增加。需要从集体经验和研究,政策文件和反思性报告的多种文献中学习。方法:对研究文献,政策和非专业网络的系统搜索确定了公众参与研究议程设置的报告。之前用于基础研究的框架分析用于开发框架,然后将该框架应用于公众参与的报告,以进行分析和比较。结果:概念框架考虑了相关人员;人民参与其中;公众参与的程度;交流论坛;以及用于决策的方法。它还考虑了上下文(根据研究重点和历史,地理或制度背景)和理论基础。结论:该框架促进了跨各种经验的学习,无论是在政策文件,反思还是正式研究中报告的,都可以产生与政策和实践相关的概述。另一个优点是,它可以识别文献中的空白,以便为公众参与的未来研究提供信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号