首页> 外文期刊>Health services research: HSR >Counting uninsurance and means-tested coverage in the American community survey: a comparison to the current population survey.
【24h】

Counting uninsurance and means-tested coverage in the American community survey: a comparison to the current population survey.

机译:在美国社区调查中计算无保险和经经济调查的覆盖范围:与当前人口调查的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare health insurance coverage estimates from the American Community Survey (ACS) to the Current Population Survey (CPS-ASEC). DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: The 2008 ACS and CPS-ASEC, 2009. STUDY DESIGN: We compare age-specific national rates for all coverage types and state-level rates of uninsurance and means-tested coverage. We assess differences using t-tests and p-values, which are reported at <.05, <.01, and <.001. An F-test determines whether differences significantly varied by state. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Despite substantial design differences, we find only modest differences in coverage estimates between the surveys. National direct purchase and state-level means-tested coverage levels for children show the largest differences. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the ACS is well poised to become a useful tool to health services researchers and policy analysts, but that further study is needed to identify sources of error and to quantify its bias.
机译:目的:比较美国社区调查(ACS)和当前人口调查(CPS-ASEC)的健康保险覆盖率估计。数据来源/研究背景:2008 ACS和CPS-ASEC,2009。研究设计:我们比较所有保险类型的特定年龄国家保险费率和州一级的非保险费率和经过经济调查的保险费率。我们使用t检验和p值评估差异,这些检验报告为<.05,<。01和<.001。 F检验确定差异是否因状态而显着变化。主要发现:尽管在设计上存在实质性差异,但我们发现调查之间的覆盖率估算仅存在适度的差异。全国直接购买和州一级经经济审查的儿童保险覆盖率差异最大。结论:我们认为ACS已经做好准备成为对卫生服务研究人员和政策分析人员有用的工具,但是还需要进一步的研究来确定错误的来源并量化其偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号