...
首页> 外文期刊>Health services research: HSR >Does the frequency of pay-for-performance payment matter?--Experience from a randomized trial.
【24h】

Does the frequency of pay-for-performance payment matter?--Experience from a randomized trial.

机译:按绩效付费的频率是否重要?-随机试验的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of incentive payment frequency on quality measures in a physician-specific pay-for-performance (P4P) experiment. STUDY SETTING: A multispecialty physician group practice. STUDY DESIGN: In 2007, all primary care physicians (n=179) were randomized into two study arms differing by the frequency of incentive payment, either four quarterly bonus checks or a single year-end bonus (maximum of U.S.Dollars 5,000/year for both arms). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data were extracted from electronic health records. Quality measure scores between the two arms over four quarters were compared. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: There was no difference between the two arms in average quality measure score or in total bonus amount earned. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' responses to a P4P program with a small maximum bonus do not differ by frequency of bonus payment.
机译:目的:在特定于医生的绩效工资(P4P)实验中检查奖励支付频率对质量指标的影响。研究背景:多学科医师小组执业。研究设计:在2007年,所有初级保健医生(n = 179)被随机分为两个研究小组,根据奖励支付的频率不同,进行四次季度奖金检查或一次年终奖金(最高为5,000美元/年双臂)。数据收集/提取方法:从电子健康记录中提取数据。比较了两个部门在四个季度内的质量测评得分。主要发现:两组之间的平均质量度量得分或获得的总奖金金额没有差异。结论:医师对P4P计划的最高奖励金额较小的反应在奖金支付频率上没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号