...
首页> 外文期刊>Head and neck: Journal for the sciences and specialities of the head and neck >Use of nasotracheal intubation in patients receiving oral cavity free flap reconstruction.
【24h】

Use of nasotracheal intubation in patients receiving oral cavity free flap reconstruction.

机译:接受气管游离皮瓣重建的患者使用气管插管。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect airway management has on perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing oral cavity free flap reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients receiving oral cavity free flap reconstruction between March 2006 and October 2007. Patient, tumor, and treatment variables were recorded. Patients were managed with nasotracheal intubation (NTI) or elective tracheotomy and different perioperative outcomes were measured. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received NTI and 21 received tracheotomy. No patients in the NTI group required conversion to tracheotomy or reintubation. The mean total hospital stay was prolonged in the tracheotomy group (12.4 days vs 8.4 days), as was their likelihood of requiring a feeding tube at discharge (76% vs 19%). In multivariate analyses, placement of a tracheotomy was independently correlated with longer hospital stay and feeding tube dependence at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: NTI is a safe alternative to tracheotomy for select patients receiving oral cavity free flap reconstruction and may reduce hospital stay and feeding tube dependence at discharge.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是评估气道处理对无瓣皮瓣再造患者围手术期结局的影响。方法:回顾性分析2006年3月至2007年10月接受无瓣皮瓣再造的患者。记录患者,肿瘤和治疗变量。患者接受鼻气管插管(NTI)或选择性气管切开术治疗,并测量了不同的围手术期结局。结果:37例患者接受了NTI,21例接受了气管切开术。 NTI组中没有患者需要转换为气管切开术或重新插管。气管切开术组平均总住院时间延长(12.4天比8.4天),出院时需要喂食管的可能性也延长了(76%比19%)。在多变量分析中,气管切开术的位置与住院时间较长和出院时对饲管的依赖性独立相关。结论:对于选择接受无瓣皮瓣重建的特定患者,NTI是气管切开术的安全替代方法,并且可以减少住院时间和出院时对饲管的依赖性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号