...
首页> 外文期刊>Haemophilia: the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia >What is the optimal mode of delivery for the haemophilia carrier expecting an affected infant-vaginal delivery or caesarean delivery?
【24h】

What is the optimal mode of delivery for the haemophilia carrier expecting an affected infant-vaginal delivery or caesarean delivery?

机译:血友病携带者预期婴儿阴道分娩或剖腹产受到影响的最佳分娩方式是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the spirit of a traditional debate, the editors have invited eminent authors to present differing views on the optimum mode of delivery in carriers expecting a baby known to be suffering from or at risk of haemophilia. Andra James and her colleagues propose caesarean section whilst Rolf Ljung proposes vaginal delivery [1,2]. They review risks and benefits to mother and baby in developing their opposing arguments. Genetic counselling, phenotypic testing of carriers and more recently genetic mutation analysis are well integrated into the delivery of comprehensive haemophilia care. Prenatal diagnosis, although informative to the management of delivery of an affected baby, is not a routine practice, and sporadic haemophilia accounts for one-third to one-half of all cases of haemophilia [3].
机译:本着传统辩论的精神,编辑们邀请杰出的作者就预期婴儿患有血友病或有血友病风险的携带者的最佳分娩方式发表不同意见。 Andra James和她的同事建议剖腹产,而Rolf Ljung建议进行阴道分娩[1,2]。他们在提出反对意见时会回顾母婴的风险和收益。遗传咨询,携带者的表型测试以及最近的遗传突变分析已很好地整合到了全面的血友病护理中。产前诊断虽然可以帮助分娩患儿,但并非常规做法,散发性血友病占所有血友病病例的三分之一至二分之一[3]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号