...
首页> 外文期刊>World journal of urology >Nephrostomy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): Does nephrostomy tube size matter? Results from The Global PCNL Study from The Clinical Research Office Endourology Society
【24h】

Nephrostomy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): Does nephrostomy tube size matter? Results from The Global PCNL Study from The Clinical Research Office Endourology Society

机译:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中的肾造口术:肾造口术管的大小重要吗?临床研究办公室内分泌学会的全球PCNL研究结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To explore the relationships between nephrostomy tube (NT) size and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) prospectively collected data from consecutive patients treated with PCNL over a 1-year period at 96 participating centers worldwide. This report focuses on the 3,968 patients who received a NT of known size. Preoperative, surgical procedure and outcome data were analyzed according to NT size, dividing patients into two groups, namely small-bore (SB; nephrostomy size ≤ 18 Fr) and large-bore (LB; nephrostomy size > 18 Fr) NT. Results: Patients who received a LB NT had a significantly lower rate of hemoglobin reduction (3.0 vs. 4.3 g/dL; P < 0.001), overall complications (15.8 vs. 21.4 %; P < 0.001) and a trend toward a lower rate of fever (9.1 vs. 10.7 %). Patients receiving a LB NT conversely had a statistically, though not clinically significant, longer postoperative hospital stay (4.4 vs. 4.2 days; P = 0.027). There were no differences in urinary leakage (0.9 vs. 1.3 %, P = 0.215) or stone-free rates (79.5 vs. 78.1 %, P = 0.281) between the two groups. Conclusions: LB NTs seem to reduce bleeding and overall complication rate. These findings would suggest that if a NT has to be placed, it should better be a LB one.
机译:目的:探讨肾造瘘管(NT)大小与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)结局之间的关系。方法:内分泌学会临床研究办公室(CROES)前瞻性收集了全球96个参与中心在1年时间内接受PCNL治疗的连续患者的数据。本报告重点关注3,968例接受NT已知大小的患者。根据NT大小分析术前,手术程序和结果数据,将患者分为两组,即小口径(SB;肾造口术大小≤18 Fr)和大口径(LB;肾造口术大小> 18 Fr)NT。结果:接受LB NT的患者血红蛋白减少率显着降低(3.0 vs. 4.3 g / dL; P <0.001),总体并发症(15.8 vs. 21.4%; P <0.001)以及呈降低趋势的趋势发烧(9.1比10.7%)。相反,接受LB NT治疗的患者术后住院时间更长(4.4天比4.2天; P = 0.027),尽管在临床上没有统计学意义。两组之间的尿漏率(0.9 vs. 1.3%,P = 0.215)或无结石率(79.5 vs. 78.1%,P = 0.281)没有差异。结论:LB NTs似乎可以减少出血和总体并发症发生率。这些发现表明,如果必须放置一个NT,则最好是LB。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号