首页> 外文期刊>Worldviews on evidence-based nursing >Content validity of a process evaluation checklist to measure intervention implementation fidelity of the EPIC intervention.
【24h】

Content validity of a process evaluation checklist to measure intervention implementation fidelity of the EPIC intervention.

机译:过程评估清单的内容有效性,以评估EPIC干预措施的干预实施保真度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Evidence-Based Practice Identification and Change (EPIC) intervention is a complex multifaceted knowledge translation strategy that combines the use of evidence and continuous quality improvement to change health care professional practices. However, there is no measure to evaluate the fidelity (degree to which the intervention was implemented as planned) of the EPIC intervention. AIM: To examine the content validity of the Process Evaluation Checklist (PEC), a newly developed measure to assess the fidelity of the EPIC intervention. METHODS: Eight health care professionals with experience in the delivery of the EPIC intervention rated the importance/relevance of items in assessing the scale/subscales of the PEC. A content validity index was computed for each item (I-CVI) and for each scale/subscale (S-CVI) in the measure. RESULTS: I-CVIs ranged from 0.6 to 1.0 and S-CVIs ranged from 0.3 to 1.0. Two items were eliminated, while nine items were retained. CONCLUSIONS: Content validity of the PEC was established. The PEC will be used to evaluate the implementation fidelity of the EPIC intervention in future trials.
机译:背景:基于证据的行为识别和变更(EPIC)干预是一种复杂的多方面知识转换策略,结合了证据的使用和持续的质量改进来改变医疗保健专业实践。但是,没有措施可以评估EPIC干预措施的保真度(按计划实施干预措施的程度)。目的:检查过程评估清单(PEC)的内容有效性,这是一种新开发的评估EPIC干预措施保真度的措施。方法:八位在实施EPIC干预方面具有经验的医疗保健专业人员对项目在评估PEC量表/子量表中的重要性/相关性进行了评估。计算该项目中每个项目(I-CVI)和每个量表/子量表(S-CVI)的内容有效性指标。结果:I-CVI的范围从0.6到1.0,S-CVI的范围从0.3到1.0。消除了两项,保留了九项。结论:建立了PEC的内容有效性。在以后的试验中,将使用PEC评估EPIC干预措施的实施保真度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号