首页> 外文期刊>Wildlife Society Bulletin >A comparison of line-transect distance sampling methods for estimating gopher tortoise population densities
【24h】

A comparison of line-transect distance sampling methods for estimating gopher tortoise population densities

机译:线样距离采样方法估计地鼠乌龟种群密度的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Line-transect distance sampling (LTDS) is increasingly used to estimate gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) densities. The process requires detecting tortoise burrows, and then determining occupancy. We compared 3 LTDS approaches that differ in howburrow detection and occupancy data are integrated, and 2 search strategies. Surveys were conducted at Avon Park Air Force Range in South-central Florida, USA, from April through October 2009. These include 1) LTDS using data from occupied burrows only;2) LTDS with burrows treated as “clusters” of size 1 or 0 depending on occupancy; 3) LTDS to estimate burrow densities, with occupancy modeling to estimate occupancy rates; and 4) 2 search strategies: standard versus expanded searches. The LTDS methodproduced reliable burrow density estimates, and tortoise densities were estimated most precisely and with least effort using data from occupied burrows only. However, any method could be biased if burrow occupancy is uncertain. Indeed, in the Florida scrub and pine flatwoods habitats, video-camera scoping was hindered by groundwater or obstructions, resulting in undetermined occupancy for 45% of burrows. Improving scope technologies and surveying during the dry season has improved subsequent results forxeric habitats; however, research is needed to improve detectability of tortoises in mesic habitats with flooded burrows. If occupancy is uncertain, we recommend collecting data on all burrows, irrespective of occupancy, so that burrow densities can beestimated even if occupancy cannot. We do not recommend expanding the search area with sigmoid search paths adjacent to transects owing to potential violations of assumptions, nor use of occupancy modeling, because model requirements may lead to unacceptable exclusion of data.
机译:线样距离采样(LTDS)越来越多地用于估计地鼠龟(Gopherus polyphemus)的密度。该过程需要检测乌龟洞穴,然后确定占用率。我们比较了3种不同方式的LTDS方法,这些方法在集成了如何探洞和占用数据方面有所差异,并比较了2种搜索策略。调查于2009年4月至2009年10月在美国佛罗里达州中南部的Avon Park空军靶场进行。这些调查包括:1)LTDS仅使用居住的洞穴数据; 2)LTDS的洞穴被视为大小为1或0的“集群”根据占用情况; 3)LTDS估算洞穴密度,并通过占用模型估算占用率;和4)2种搜索策略:标准搜索与扩展搜索。 LTDS方法可得出可靠的洞穴密度估算值,并且仅使用占用的洞穴数据即可最精确,最省力地估算出乌龟密度。但是,如果不确定洞穴的占用,则任何方法都可能存在偏差。的确,在佛罗里达灌木丛和松树林的生境中,地下水或障碍物阻碍了摄像机的摄录范围,导致无法确定45%的洞穴的占有率。在干旱季节,改进范围技术和进行勘测可以改善随后的结果,说明有氧生境。但是,需要进行研究以提高在淹没洞穴的直行生境中乌龟的可检测性。如果占用率不确定,我们建议收集所有洞穴的数据,而不管占用率如何,以便即使无法占用,也可以估算洞穴密度。由于可能违反假设,因此不建议使用与样条线相邻的S型搜索路径来扩展搜索区域,也不建议使用占用模型,因为模型要求可能会导致无法接受的数据排除。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号