首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Emergency Medicine >EMERGENCY MEDICINE RESIDENTS' KNOWLEDGE OF MECHANICAL VENTILATION
【24h】

EMERGENCY MEDICINE RESIDENTS' KNOWLEDGE OF MECHANICAL VENTILATION

机译:紧急医疗人员的机械通气知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Although Emergency physicians frequently intubate patients, management of mechanical ventilation has not been emphasized in emergency medicine (EM) residency curricula. Objectives: The objective of this study was to quantify EM residents' education, experience, and knowledge regarding mechanical ventilation. Methods: We developed a survey of residents' educational experiences with ventilators and an assessment tool with nine clinical questions. Correlation and regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between residents' scores on the assessment instrument and their training, education, and comfort with ventilation. Results: Of 312 EM residents, 218 responded (69.9%). The overall correct response rate for the assessment tool was 73.3%, standard deviation (SD) +/- 22.3. Seventy-seven percent (n = 167) of respondents reported <= 3 h of mechanical ventilation education in their residency curricula over the past year. Residents reported frequently caring for ventilated patients in the ED, as 64% (n = 139) recalled caring for >= 4 ventilated patients per month. Fifty-three percent (n = 116) of residents endorsed feeling comfortable caring for mechanically ventilated ED patients. In multiregression analysis, the only significant predictor of total test score was residents' comfort with caring for mechanically ventilated patients (F = 10.963, p = 0.001). Conclusions: EM residents report caring for mechanically ventilated patients frequently, but receive little education on mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, as residents' performance on the assessment tool is only correlated with their self-reported comfort with caring for ventilated patients, these results demonstrate an opportunity for increased educational focus on mechanical ventilation management in EM residency training. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc.
机译:背景:尽管急诊医师经常为患者插管,但急诊医学(EM)住院医师课程并未强调机械通气的管理。目的:本研究的目的是量化EM居民对机械通风的教育,经验和知识。方法:我们对居民的呼吸机教育经历进行了调查,并设计了带有9个临床问题的评估工具。进行了相关和回归分析,以评估评估仪器上的居民得分与其培训,教育和通风舒适度之间的关系。结果:在312位EM居民中,有218位响应(69.9%)。评估工具的总体正确回答率为73.3%,标准偏差(SD)+/- 22.3。在过去一年中,有77%(n = 167)的受访者在其居住课程中报告了<= 3 h的机械通风教育。居民报告急诊部经常护理通气患者,因为64%(n = 139)的患者每月需要护理4例以上的通气患者。 53%(n = 116)的居民支持对机械通气的ED患者感到舒适的护理。在多元回归分析中,总测试得分的唯一重要预测指标是居民对机械通气患者的照料舒适度(F = 10.963,p = 0.001)。结论:EM居民报告经常护理机械通气患者,但很少接受机械通气教育。此外,由于居民在评估工具上的表现仅与他们自我报告的对通气患者的舒适度相关,因此这些结果表明在EM住院医师培训中,有机会增加对机械通气管理的教育重点。 (C)2015爱思唯尔公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号