...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Emergency Medicine >Evaluation of Limitation-of-Medical-Treatment Forms Used in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs in the United States.
【24h】

Evaluation of Limitation-of-Medical-Treatment Forms Used in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs in the United States.

机译:对美国急诊医学住院医师计划中使用的医疗限制形式的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Patients are encouraged to complete limitation-of-medical-treatment forms (LMTFs), sometimes referred to as code status forms or do-not-resuscitate forms, before admission to hospitals or other health care facilities in the United States. Objective: The purpose of this study was to review, evaluate, and to assess the LMTFs currently used in emergency medicine residency training programs throughout the United States. Methods: In February 2009, researchers sent letters to all allopathic and osteopathic emergency medicine residency program directors (n = 193) requesting a copy of the LMTF used in their hospital. These forms were evaluated for content, consistency, and readability. Results: Sixty-five responses were received (corrected response rate = 34%); 45 LMTFs were reviewed. Nineteen LMTFs required the signature of the patient, or the patient's appointed durable power of attorney for health care. The readability ranged from 11th to 17th grade (mean +/- SD = 13.16 +/- 1.77), greatly exceeding the average Americans' 8(th)-grade reading level. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that there is no standardization across LMTFs currently used in hospitals throughout the United States, and these forms are written above the literacy level of the average American adult. Therefore, there is a need to develop and disseminate an LMTF that is both consistent and better understood by the average American adult.
机译:背景:鼓励患者在进入美国的医院或其他医疗机构之前,填写医疗限制表格(LMTF),有时也称为规范状态表格或不复诊表格。目的:本研究的目的是审查,评估和评估目前在美国全美急诊医学住院医师培训计划中使用的LMTF。方法:2009年2月,研究人员向所有同种疗法和整骨疗法急诊医学住院医师计划主任(n = 193)发送了一封信,要求他们在医院使用的LMTF的副本。对这些表格的内容,一致性和可读性进行了评估。结果:收到65份回复(校正后的回复率= 34%);审查了45个LMTF。 19个LMTF需要患者签名,或患者指定的持久性卫生保健委托书。可读性介于11到17年级之间(平均+/- SD = 13.16 +/- 1.77),大大超过了美国人8(th)年级的平均阅读水平。结论:我们的发现表明,目前在美国各地的医院中使用的LMTF尚无标准化,并且这些表格的书写水平超过了美国成年人的识字水平。因此,有必要开发和传播一种LMTF,这种LMTF对于美国成年人来说既一致又更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号